Woman (88) settles action against council over footpath fall for €160,000

An 88-year-old woman who claimed she suffered injuries after she allegedly tripped and fell on a footpath in Kilkenny City has settled her High Court action for €160,000.

Sarah Mahoney, of Pearse Street, Kilkenny, had sued Kilkenny County Council over the alleged fall four years ago.

She claimed she was caused to lose her footing when she encountered an alleged defective and hazardous broken section of footpath.

Her counsel, David Kennedy SC, told the High Court it was their case that Mrs Mahoney was walking near McDonagh Street not far from her home on the afternoon of September 19th, 2020th when she allegedly tripped and fell on an alleged broken section of footpath.

He said Mrs Mahoney fell forward onto her face and outstretched arm, suffering fractures to her arm and injury to her face. She also suffered an immediate nosebleed and was brought to hospital by ambulance.

She spent five days in hospital and counsel said Mrs Mahoney’s daughter had to care for her mother at home for another three weeks after the fall.

He added their side’s engineering expert would say there appeared to be vehicular damage to the footpath in question.

Mr Kennedy said Mrs Mahoney had been a very active woman prior to the incident, but this changed thereafter.

He told Mr Justice Paul Coffey the Mahoney side would face a battle in relation to liability in the case, noting all the claims were denied by the council.

In the proceedings, which Mrs Mahoney brought through her daughter Catherine Conde, it was claimed there was an alleged failure in the construction of the footpath to ensure that it would be capable of taking the weight of vehicular traffic.

It was further claimed there was an alleged failure to adequately compact the subbase of the path, and as a result, it was allegedly caused to subside and break.

It was also claimed there was an alleged failure to ensure that portion of the footpath was safe and suitable for pedestrians such as Mrs Mahoney.

All the claims were denied.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey noted there was a significant litigation risk in the case, adding he thought the offer was fair and reasonable.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...