Woman’s €760,000 injury claim dismissed after she admits she won Christmas tree-throwing competition

27 February 2024

A mum of two has lost her €760,000 claim for injuries sustained from a car crash after she was hailed the winner of a Christmas tree tossing competition.

Kamila Grabska, 36, from Ireland, was caught red-handed after she was pictured hurling a “large” tree a year after the accident took place. It comes after the mum claimed she was left with a “disabling” condition after the vehicle she was in was hit from behind in February 2017.

The mum said she would be unable to work for more than five years due to the deliberating condition. She further claimed that her injuries would affect how she plays with her kids. But she also went as far as to say that the injury hindered her from being able to carry heavy shopping bags.

However, a court dismissed her case after it was shown the incriminating photo in a national newspaper of her throwing the tree with “a very agile” movement. Grabska admitted that she did look happy in the photos from the charity event but said she still endures pain since the crash.

Despite the mum’s plea, Judge Carmel Stewart said that the “very graphic picture” from the seventh annual Christmas Tree Throwing Championships had helped her make the decision.

The married mum from Ennis, County Clare, told doctors her injuries were so severe after the accident, on February 3, 2017, that she could not lift a heavy bag without feeling shooting pain. She quit her job following the crash and took disability payments – writing in court documents her past and future loss of earnings amounted to €500,000. The injury claim amounted to €760,383. 

Grabska even said there were times when her husband had to bring medication to her in bed, which she could not leave for half of the day due to her agony. But the court heard that just a few days before she had informed doctors of her terrible condition, she had finished top in the charity Christmas tree chucking event.

During the hearing, some footage was also submitted in evidence from November last year that showed Grabska training her large dog for over an hour in a park. She denied the suggestion that she had faked her injuries, telling the court that she was simply “trying to live a normal life,” the Irish Independent reported. 

But her case was dismissed after the judge ruled her activities following the crash were “completely at odds” with the medical evidence she gave of her injuries.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Injuries board reports 10% rise in claims last year

The Injuries Resolution Board (IRB) has seen a 10% increase in claims made to it during 2023, resulting in €170m being paid out in personal injury awards, new reports show. According to the latest annual report from the IRB, formerly known as the Personal Injuries...

Understanding the Recent Norney v. Dr. Michael Watt Case

On 3 October 2024, the High Court in Belfast delivered a significant judgement in the case of Martine Norney versus Dr Michael Watt and the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust. Martine Norney was awarded £50,000 in damages after it was determined that her treatment...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...