Young disabled man awarded €1m over serious brain injury in assault at respite centre

brain scan

16 December 2022

The High Court has approved a €3.5 million interim settlement for a woman who allegedly suffered brain damage during her birth 24 years ago.

The woman, who cannot be named as she is a ward of court, sued the guardians and directors of the Coombe Lying-in Hospital, Dublin where she was born in May 1998.

The hospital strongly denied the claim.

Liability and causation of the alleged brain injury were very much in dispute, the court heard.

The settlement, which provides for the woman for the next five years, was arrived at following mediation.

Bruce Antionotti SC, for the woman, said the case arose out of her delivery in the Coombe Hospital in 1998 when, his side argued, his client was caused to suffer a brain injury by reason of the alleged negligence on the part of midwives and doctors during labour.

This was strongly contested by a number of respected medics who provided reports for the defendant, the court heard.

As a result of the injury, counsel said, she was eventually diagnosed with conditions including developmental delay and epilepsy. She also has language difficulty and a moderate intellectual disability.

Once the diagnosis was made, an investigation into the circumstances of her birth commenced in 2015 and in 2017 High Court proceedings were issued against the hospital.

Counsel said she completed her education in a special needs school and later undertook life-skills courses which she enjoyed but which were interrupted by the pandemic. She never returned. She has been cared for mainly by her mother for the last 24 years, counsel said.

She has no mobility issues but could not go out on her own because she has no sense of safety and has poor memory, he said. She mainly stays at her home and it is hoped the settlement can provide for improved accommodation and therapies, among other aids, over the next few years, counsel said.

Mr Justice Paul Coffey approved the €3.5 million and ordered that €660,000 be paid out “having regard to the extraordinary work done by her mother” over the last 24 years. He wished the mother, who was present in court, and her family, all the best for the future.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...