Woman who suffered severe brain injury following birth of child settles for €10m

A woman who sued a hospital over an alleged delay in diagnosing and treating a viral illness has settled her High Court action for €10 million. The settlement, against St Vincent’s Healthcare Group DAC trading as St Vincent’s University Hospital, was reached without an admission of liability.

Leanne Doyle (35), of Glenview Road, WicklowTown, Co Wicklow, suffered a “severe” brain injury and relies on a wheelchair, said her counsel, Aongus O’Brolchain SC, instructed by Michael Boylan Litigation Law Firm. She “lost all enjoyment” in the first five years of her daughter’s life as a result of her injuries, he said.

The court heard Ms Doyle had a seizure around the time of her discharge from the National Maternity Hospital on July 1st 2014 following the birth of her daughter.

Ms Doyle was transferred to St Vincent’s hospital, where, she claims, her viral illness was not properly managed and where there was an alleged failure to provide appropriate and timely intervention. As an inpatient she underwent tests and treatment under the care of neurologists and, on July 3rd, a shadow was revealed on her brain in an MRI scan, the court heard. Further investigations were performed and she received various treatments. Ms Doyle suffered another seizure, but the correct diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Encephalitis was not yet considered, it was claimed in her action. Mr O’Brolchain said it was his client’s case that a drug for treating encephalitis should have been administered on the evening of July 4th. 

Aciclovir, the viral treatment, was not administered until the 9th, allowing the illness to “fester” for three to four days, he claimed.

In her High Court action Ms Doyle, who sued through her father, claimed the hospital failed to provide an appropriate and timely diagnosis. The claims were denied and the case was settled without admission of liability. 

Mr O’Brolchain said it was the defendant’s case that the damage had already occurred by July 5th. Ms Doyle remained in St Vincent’s until March the following year before being transferred to the National Rehabilitation Hospital.

She stayed in a brain injury unit in Drogheda until early 2019, the court heard. Ms Doyle would like to be able to live in the community, with supports, and it is her priority to help provide some care for her daughter, counsel added.

Mr Justice Paul Coffey said he had “very little difficulty” approving the settlement, which he described as “very reasonable”.

He also made an order for €200,000 of the sum to be paid to Ms Doyle’s parents for backdated care-related costs. He wished Ms Doyle and her parents well and reserved legal costs for a date in December.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...