Settlement of €1.9m for woman who claimed she was misdiagnosed with cancer

Four Courts Building. 1796-1802. Dublin, Ireland

15 December 2023

A woman who claimed she was misdiagnosed with cancer and endured highly toxic chemotherapy treatment as a teenager has settled a High Court action for €1.9 million.

Aoife O’Donovan was 17 years of age when she received the lymphoma cancer diagnosis after she was admitted to the Bon Secours Hospital, Cork, with abdominal pain.

Her senior counsel, Dr John O’Mahony, with Cian O’Mahony BL, told the High Court that the girl’s condition was investigated and it was their case that she was in October 2005 misdiagnosed with T Cell Lymphoma cancer when, in fact, she had a benign self-limiting condition called Kikuchis Disease.

Dr O’Mahony said the two diagnoses were at “opposite ends of the spectrum”.

It was claimed that Ms O’Donovan, who is now aged 35, was subjected to severe, multiple and unnecessary tests, scans, x-rays, biopsies and treatment, including chemotherapy, was subjected to considerable anxiety, upset, distress and inconvenience. She was advised in December 2006 that she never had the cancer but had an unrelated virus.

She had six courses of chemotherapy treatment between November 2005 and April 2006. In all, she spent seven months in hospital and at one stage had to take 32 tablets a day. Counsel said Ms O’Donovan could not sit her Leaving Certificate and her career prospects were compromised.

Ms O’Donovan, from Airport Road, Cork city, on Wednesday settled a High Court action against consultant histopathologist, Eoin O’Murchu, who practises at the Bon Secours Hospital in Cork city. The settlement is without an admission of liability but an apology from Mr O’Murchu was read to the court.

In the apology, Mr O’Murchu conveyed his “sincere and heartfelt apologies” over Ms O’Donovan’s pathology diagnosis of October 28th, 2005.

“I regret the significant injuries that you have suffered and the distress caused over many years. I offer my deepest sympathy to you,” he said.

In the proceedings, it was claimed that Mr O’Murchu failed to have any regard to the fact that the histological features are typical of Kikuchis Disease.

The claims were denied.

Noting the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was a very sad case and he told Ms O’Donovan, who was in court with her family, that he was delighted that the matter had been resolved.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...