Laser hair removal and waxing among leading causes of injuries in hair and beauty sector

Claims over eyelash extensions and chemical peel treatments on the rise.

Laser hair removal and waxing are among the leading causes of injuries in the Irish hair and beauty sector, including scarring and burns, but claims over eyelash extensions and chemical peel treatments are increasing, according to data from the Injuries Resolution Board.

The board received 437 claims related to the hair and beauty sector between 2019 and 2023 and made 96 awards totalling €1.2 million, said Dr Lauren Swan, the board’s head of research and policy. Its research, she said, was prompted by an RTÉ Prime Time investigation earlier this year into injuries within the sector.

Women accounted for almost all – 96 per cent – of the 437 claims submitted, and the average age of claimants was 38.

Most claims, 75, related to laser hair removal, while 56 concerned waxing, 45 alleged an allergic reaction to dyes and tints, and 43 related to facial treatments.

Scalp burns as a result of dye accounted for 37 claims, 32 related to the use of botox/filler, 23 concerned nail treatments, and 19 concerned eyelash extensions.

Total claim volumes for the sector were 30 per cent lower last year than in 2019, but it is unclear whether this is due to improved health and safety within the sector or is a lingering effect of the Covid-19 pandemic, she said.

Claim volumes were lower in 2023 across all injury causes, except for two beauty treatments – eyelash extensions and chemical peel treatments – where claim numbers increased.

Of the €1.2 million awarded, €260,000 related to slips, trips and falls, €112,000 to waxing, €106,000 to scalp burns, €104,000 to facial treatment, €89,000 to laser hair removal, €76,000 to nail treatments, €68,000 to hair damage, €60,000 for allergic reactions and €325,000 for other causes.

Dermatitis or other skin conditions and facial scarring and burns occurred respectively in 22 per cent and 21 per cent of cases. Non-facial scarring and burns accounted for 13 per cent, and hair damage and eye injuries accounted for 11 per cent each.

In relation to treatments for the injuries, 38 per cent required antibiotic treatment, 24 per cent were administered steroids and 5 per cent required healthcare visits for care of wounds.

Dr Swan presented the data during a recent conference marking 20 years since the establishment of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board, now known as the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB).

Overall, the board made more than 9,000 awards totalling €170 million last year, a drop of more than €100 million on the €275 million awarded in 2019.

Of the 2023 awards, most, 6,230, concerned motor claims, 1,629 public liability, and 1,285 employer liability.

Average award values were 23 per cent lower than in 2020 (before the introduction in April 2021 of judicially approved guidelines slashing awards for mainly minor injuries), but 17 per cent higher than the average 2022 award, said Dr Swan.

The board is now assessing more complex injury claims, she said. Neck and back injuries no longer account for most cases assessed and that decline coincided with an increase in awards for psychiatric damage.

As the board is the central body responsible for the collection of data into more than 20,000 accidents every year, it is hoped its research function will continue to inform evidence-based policy in the areas of accident prevention, public health and wider insurance reform, Dr Swan said.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...