Health and safety trainer loses €60,000 action against Lidl over lifting heavy pack of bottles

A health and safety trainer, who allegedly showed reckless disregard for his own safety by lifting weights he would advise others not to lift, has lost a €60,000 damages claim against Lidl and has been ordered to pay the store’s significant legal costs.

Judge Alice Doyle told 40-year-old Adam Kaminski that while she considered him an honest witness, the court considered he had been adequately and extensively trained in safety procedures by Lidl.

Garreth Holland, a Lidl administrative executive, told the court sitting in Wexford that Kaminski, of Elm Park, New Ross, had undergone an intensive five-day manual handling course just over a year before an incident in which he claimed to have injured his lower back.

Mr Holland said Mr Kaminski had in fact become a qualified manual handling trainer for Lidl before the August 2018 incident at its Marsh Meadows outlet had happened.

Mr Kaminski claimed he had injured a disc in his back when lifting a heavy pack of water bottles. He said he had suffered pain in his lower back and left leg but had continued working on through his shift.

The court heard he had been seen by a doctor in New Ross who had certified him unfit for work. He had never taken up his job again with Lidl, but instead was now working as a customer assistant with a transport company.

Mr Kaminiski told barrister Kevin Byrne, who appeared with Ronan Daly Jermyn solicitors for the store, that because of a long waiting list in Ireland for orthopaedic appointments, he had travelled to his native Poland for surgery on his back. In October 2018 he had undergone a discectomy there.

Back in Wexford, he had revisited his GP Dr Michael O’Beirne in November 2018 who had advised him to commence a physiotherapy programme of rehabilitation.

Dismissing Mr Kaminski’s claim, Judge Doyle said he had been adequately trained and had diverged from that extensive training given by Lidl against whom she could not find any evidence of negligence or breach of duty.

She ordered Mr Kaminski to pay Lidl’s legal costs of contesting his claim.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...