Factory worker injured by falling glass awarded damages

four courts, dublin

17 May 2022

A glass factory worker who sustained injuries to his lower limbs after being struck and knocked to the ground by several sheets of glass that fell from a trolley has been awarded a six-figure sum in damages by the High Court. 

The award, which has yet to be finalised by Mr Justice Garrett Simons, was made in favour of 59-year-old James Molloy who sustained compression injuries to his lower limbs, back as well as several lacerations. 

Mr Molloy of Knight’s Crescent, Nenagh, Co Tipperary had sued his employer Tipperary Glass Limited of Railway Road, Templemore Co Tipperary, who he alleged had been negligent, for injuries sustained on March 16th, 2018. 

Liability in the case had been admitted and the action was before the court for assessment of damages only. 

In his judgement Mr Justice Simons said that Mr Molloy is entitled to a sum of €75,000 in general damages plus a further €38,000 in damages for a loss of earnings to date. 

He is also to receive a sum equivalent to four years of earnings in respect of loss of future earnings. 

That precise sum, the court noted, is to be finalised at a later date. 

The judge the accident had occurred because another employee had failed to properly secure the sheets of glass which were stacked on a trolley. 

The judge said that the glass that fell from the trolley impacted on Mr Molloy’s limbs. Mr Molloy the judge said had estimated that the trolley had been carrying between 10 to 20 sheets of glass at the time, and the aggregate weight of the glass was 100kg. 

Following the accident Mr Molloy, the judge said, was confined to bed for four to six weeks. 

His injuries took some time to heal, and he was left with permanent scarring on his legs.

The consensus of the medical evidence was that arising out of his injuries Mr Molloy was medically unfit for the sort of manual labour he had done at the glass factory, the judge said. 

The judge added that he was satisfied from that the current chronic back pain suffered by Mr Molloy was caused by the accident. 

Mr Molloy, the judge said, had suffered injuries that are moderately severe. The judge made awards totalling €113,000 in favour of Mr Molloy under various headings. 

In respect of loss of earnings that he would have earned had it not been for the accident the judge said Mr Molloy was entitled to a capital sum yet to be determined. 

Mr Molloy, the judge added, was also entitled to an additional €7,000 for special damages. The claim will return before the court to deal with outstanding matters later this month.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...