Dunnes Stores worker who dislocated ankle while organising shelves awarded €161,000

A Dunnes Stores worker who dislocated her ankle after she fell off a ladder while organising supermarket shelves has been awarded almost €161,000 by the High Court.

Mr Justice Michael Hanna said he accepted Gunta Kadege’s evidence of what happened, that she had just made the second rung of the ladder when it became unstable.

It was contended by Ms Kadege that the side that the ladder was allegedly defective, and it had gone one way, and she went the other and fell off.

She had told the court she thought she was on the second rung of the ladder when the accident happened in the Dunnes Stores in Leopardstown, Dublin, four years ago.

Dunnes Stores had disputed Ms Kadege’s version of events and contended she tripped over the ladder as she walked past it.

Mr Justice Michael Hanna said there was also a debate relating to CCTV on the day of the accident, and he preferred the view of the engineer on the Kadege side, which underpinned her account of the accident.

Ms Kadege was using a light, domestic ladder and there was a significant wobble which was sufficient to cause the accident.

There was no suggestion Ms Kadege was doing anything dangerous, the judge said.

The accident was caused by the frame which had come loose and there was no evidence of any inspection or risk assessment in relation to the ladder.

That, the judge said, was the root of the accident and Ms Kadege was using a ladder that was simply not suitable to carry out the task.

Denial of claims

Mr Justice Hanna also noted that the medical evidence was that Ms Kadege’s injuries were consistent with a fall from a ladder, and he found Ms Kadege to be an honest person.

Gunta Kadege (55) of Butlersgrange, Tullow, Co Carlow had sued her then employer Dunnes Stores over the accident on September 20th, 2018, in which she suffered a fracture dislocation to her ankle.

She had to have surgery and said she was left extremely limited in all recreational and social activities due to her injury. She had moved to another section of the supermarket, but later took redundancy from Dunnes Stores.

It was claimed that the ladder used by Ms Kadege was allegedly defective and there was an alleged failure by way of testing or inspection to discover that the ladder was unfit for use.

Dunnes Stores denied all the claims and contended that Ms Kadege had in fact tripped over the ladder.

Mr Justice Hanna said Ms Kadege was doing her job as required and could not be faulted for doing it zealously.

He said she was on the floor for a very prolonged period as they waited for an ambulance and during that time a statement was taken from her, and she said she was on the ladder at the time of the accident.

Mr Justice Hanna assessed a total of €120,000 damages and also allowed for €40,961 special damages.

Counsel for Dunnes Stores Hugh Mohan SC said it intended to appeal and applied for a stay. Mr Justice Hanna granted a stay provided one third of the award is paid out.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...