Bus driver awarded €60,000 for slip on black ice

A bus driver who slipped on black ice at the top of a staircase in a common area of his apartment block has been awarded more than €60,000 by the High Court against the apartment managers.

Shakur Ahmed (53), Castlegrange Square, Clondalkin, Dublin, fractured his elbow when he fell down an entire flight of stairs as he was leaving for work at 5.15am on November 21st , 2016.

He sued Castlegrange Management Co Ltd and Castlegrange Square Management Co Ltd, with registered offices at Dunboyne Business Park, Co Meath. Both defendants were found to be jointly and severally liable.

He claimed the defendants were negligent in the maintenance, upkeep and repair of the landing and stairs where the accident occurred. It was alleged there was a failure to warn of the dangers of the tiled floor by way of signs, guards or otherwise.

Mr Ahmed said rain had been coming in on a light above his apartment door and it was cold and dark as he left home that morning.

The light in the landing had fused a week before the incident, he said. When he slipped and fell down the entire flight of stairs there was no “nosing”, which provides grip, on the first three steps on the stairs, he said.

The claims were denied. The defendants argued the reason for the accident was that the conditions were wet, icy and slippery. If there had been black ice as claimed the fixing of the light would have had no effect on the incident as black ice would be clear and invisible regardless of the lighting, it was argued.

The defendants also relied on the evidence of engineers that the nosing would not have had much effect in avoiding the accident as the ice would likely have risen above the level of nosing.

Mr Ahmed, who bought the apartment in the 98-unit complex in 2008 for himself, his wife and children, said that, had the light been working, he might have seen something on the surface.

He said it was also up to the management company to grit the landing and that he was paying the service charge for that.

He drove to work in Ringsend bus depot that morning and did not know there was blood pouring from him onto the floor. He was brought by ambulance to hospital, and the next day he was found to have a puncture wound over his left elbow and x-rays showed a displaced comminuted fracture of the left elbow. He spent the following two months at home.

Ms Justice Bronagh O’Hanlon found as a fact that the incident involved black ice, as Mr Ahmed had claimed.

Therefore, any repair to the lighting would not have averted the accident, she said.

The area in question was a public pathway that fell within the control of the defendants and the effect of gritting would have averted this accident, she said.

She rejected the argument that there would have been no beneficial effect to this surface if it had been gritted.

The issues concerning water dripping through the light fixture were a major contributor to the causing of ice to form on the surface given the weather conditions at the time, she said.

If nosings on the steps had been in place and in proper condition, they would have assisted in breaking his fall, she also said.

The court found the appropriate award in consideration of the seriousness of the injury sustained, was €60,201, including some €3,700 in special damage.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...