Young Cork boy settles with Aer Lingus over failure to fly him on ‘Share a dream’ trip

Aer Lingus

2 August 2021

Aer Lingus has paid more than €8,000 plus costs to the family of a boy with serious medical conditions who was disappointed not to travel to Orlando on the national airline on a ‘Share a Dream’ trip.

The good news was that Rian Stack and his family from Cork did manage to get to Orlando with another airline instead for the trip in 2019.

And some even better news emerged from the 11-year-old boy himself after the case when he told of the family’s latest plans to travel to Disneyland. Between that and plans for a celebratory Capri-Sun drink, Rian Stack was happy after his visit to court.

However, it was the disappointment of not being able to fly with Aer Lingus which was first dealt with at the ruling of the settlement offer by Judge Joanne Carroll at Cork District Court.

The family’s solicitor, Amy Connolly from Cantillon Solicitors, said: “Rian is a young boy who has a tracheostomy and is a wheelchair user. He suffers with a neuromuscular condition, myotublar myopathy as well as a respiratory condition and scoliosis. He does not have an intellectual disability.“On or about January 20, 2019, Aer Lingus agreed to provide business class return flights from Dublin to Orlando to the claimants departing on October 15 2019 and returning on October 31. The flights were booked for the purposes of a once-in-a-lifetime family holiday to Orlando which was part of a ‘Share a Dream’ trip, a foundation that grants wishes for sick children.

“Rian, his parents and younger brother were travelling to Orlando, along with Rian’s grandparents and a nurse. His aunt and uncle were to join them a few days later. Rian was required to lie flat for periods during the course of the long-haul flight and also required the use of a portable oxygen concentrator (POC). The Aer Lingus’s website said it permitted the use of approved POCs.”

The solicitor said Aer Lingus later informed the family on August 22, 2019, that the POC, which the family supplied themselves, was not permitted in the business class cabin and could only be allowed in the economy cabin as it could not be secured under forward seat storage in business class.

“Rian’s parents feared the entire trip would be placed in jeopardy and as a result they contacted KLM/Delta Airlines who were in a position to accommodate Rian using the POC in business class with no difficulty.

“The events caused significant stress, inconvenience and financial loss and expense as a result of the acts of the respondent,” Ms Connolly said.

The  good news was that Rian Stack and his family from Cork did manage to get to Orlando with another airline instead for the trip in 2019.

Judge Carroll said: “In fairness, Aer Lingus have made a very good settlement, totalling €8,250. I order it be paid out immediately. I am also going to order the costs be paid by Aer Lingus.” 

Rian’s father, Stephen Stack, said the family was happy with the settlement. He said the case was about access and would not have been taken had Aer Lingus been consistent in the application of some of its own policies.

Judge Carroll said: “To be fair, Aer Lingus are usually very very good. They are an excellent carrier and they would have had to undertake a risk assessment. No doubt they will learn from the case. I have no doubt Aer Lingus will rectify the position going forward.”

To the Stack family, Judge Carroll said: “I commend you for your tenacity. It is not always easy to keep going in the face of adversity.”

Orla Stack afterwards commented generally about their son’s life as a wheelchair user: “This won’t be the last fight we have. We come across things every month. That is the reality for a wheelchair user in Ireland.”

Source: Irish Examiner

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...