Woman’s €56,000 award for injuries after jug exploded

14 December 2019

A woman who was scalded when a glass jug she bought in Dunnes Stores exploded after she poured hot water from a kettle into it has been awarded more than €56,000 by the High Court.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross found the jug did not have a label warning against using it for hot liquids.

He accepted Eva Cekanova would not have purchased it if it had the label.

He found Dunnes Stores was negligent to have sold the glass jug without a warning label.

The jug, the judge said, was not made of tempered glass and clearly was not suitable for making tea.

He said making tea in a glass jug was not an Irish custom but is a custom in other parts of the EU. This was what Ms Cekanova, who is from Slovakia, was doing.

The cultural certainties, he said, of an Ireland of “sturdy youths and maidens dancing at the crossroads” are no longer applicable here.

Dunnes, he said, ought to have known people in Ireland from foreign countries will use a glass jug to make tea and pour hot water into it.

However, the judge said Ms Cekanova, who has lived in Ireland for a number of years, ought to have known tea here is not made in glass jugs. She had some obligation to check if the jug was suitable before putting hot water in it, he said.

It might appear harsh, but Ms Cekanova could not escape from a finding of contributory negligence on her part for not checking, he said.

The judge found that Dunnes was 75pc responsible and Ms Cekanova was 25pc liable for the accident.

Ms Cekanova, a warehouse operator, suffered scalding wounds and ugly blisters and has been left with scarring, he said.

She had not exaggerated her complaints and it was highly commendable that she returned to work two weeks after the accident, he said.

Mr Justice Cross said she suffered a significant injury and will have the marks from the burns all her life.

Assessing the total damages to be €75,844, the judge reduced the award by 25pc to allow for the contributory negligence, bringing the final total awarded to €56,883.

Ms Cekanova (30), of Windmill Terrace, Clonsilla, Dublin, had sued Dunnes over the accident with the jug, which she bought at the Blanchardstown Shopping Centre, Dublin, on December 5, 2015.

Dunnes denied all the claims and that the incident occurred as alleged.

It contended Ms Cekanova allegedly failed to heed a warning sticker on the jug which Dunnes said specifically states not to use hot water in the jug.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...