Two Brothers Of Girl Mauled At Dublin Zoo Awarded €33k Each

Caged Animal

1 December 2020

Schoolboy brothers Daithi and Cathal Owens, who saw their two-year-old sister, Katie, mauled and seriously injured in an attack by a Brazilian tapir at Dublin Zoo, have received damages settlements of €33,000 each for nervous shock.

Judge John O’Connor, approving the €66,000 compensation pay-out today in the Circuit Civil Court, heard the boys were only eight and six when the savage attack occurred in August 2013.

Katie, who suffered severe arm and stomach injuries, was saved when her mother, Patricia Frost, risked her own life by throwing her body against the enraged animal and between it and her baby toddler.

Approved Settlement

The court, which two years ago approved a €25,000 settlement to another sibling, 10-year-old Ruari, was told by barrister Francis McGagh (correct) that the tapir attacked after the Owens family had been allowed into the enclosure for a close-up with Rio and her new-born calf, Jenny.

The attack made world headlines at the time, and the Zoological Society of Ireland was charged with breaching health and safety regulations but was spared a criminal conviction after agreeing to pay €5,000 to local charities.

Katie, following first aid treatment at the zoo, had been rushed to Temple Street Children’s Hospital for emergency surgery. Her mother was also hospitalised and treated for injuries in Dublin’s Mater Hospital.

Psychological Trauma

It is believed the tapir; usually, a docile mammal, attacked following an “excited screech” made by little Katie, picking her up in its mouth and violently shaking her. In a split-second response, her mother had thrown herself on the tapir, dislodging her daughter from the animal’s mouth, as the zookeeper and the child’s father, restrained the attacking animal.

The family’s representative told Judge O’Connor that Daithi and Cathal had suffered significant psychological trauma in the aftermath of the incident, including disturbing recall incidents, nightmares and anxiety.

“The boys had been terrified, shocked and shaken,” the representative said.

He said the publication in a medical journal of little Katie’s horrific injuries and further publication of the pictures in the media generally had undoubtedly greatly exacerbated the family’s distress.

The family’s representative already told the Circuit Civil Court, which is limited to awards of up to €60,000, that a personal injury claim on behalf of Katie and claims on behalf of her parents had been launched in the unlimited financial jurisdiction of the High Court.

The claims on behalf of Mr Owens and Ms Frost may be settled out of court at any time.

Irish Examiner

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...