Truck driver withdraws compensation claim after judge warns about changing evidence

The Four Courts

28 November 2022

A truck driver who claimed he was injured in a road accident withdrew his action for damages after he was warned by a High Court judge about how he was changing evidence he was giving through an interpreter.

Roman Siry (39), who claimed he hurt his shoulder in the December 2018 accident which has restricted his ability to work, was being cross examined about a photo of him on a racing motorbike at Poznan Racecourse in 2019 and about a previous work accident for which he had received nearly a quarter of a million euros in compensation.

Mr Siry, who had lived in Ireland from 2007 until 2019, and now lives at Balun ul Wisniowa, Goleniow, Poland, sued Niamh Finn from Ballinadee, Bandon, Co Cork, after her car collided with his lorry at Horsehill, Bandon, on a dark December 6 morning, 2018.

The car was wrecked in the collision which broke the step at the driver’s door of the lorry. Not knowing the step was gone, Mr Siry fell on to the ground when he got out of the cab after the accident and claimed he hurt his shoulder.

Liability was admitted and the case was before Mr Justice Michael Hanna for assessment of damages.

Mr Siry gave direct evidence to his counsel Gerald Tynan SC, through a Polish interpreter, about how the accident happened.

However, when Edward Walsh SC, instructed by Declan O’Flaherty of Tormeys Solicitors, objected that the interpreter seemed to be giving evidence rather than translating, the case was adjourned and another interpreter was brought in.

Mr Walsh, in his cross examination through the second interpreter, asked Mr Siry why he never told the investigating garda who arrived at the accident that he had hurt his shoulder. Mr Siry said he was under severe stress at the time.

Mr Siry told counsel he took the rest of the day off but continued working for the next six months until he returned to Poland. He disagreed he had never told his then employers that he suffered an injury in the accident.

Asked about who arranged appointments with a neurologist, a psychologist, and an orthopaedic surgeon, he said some were by his lawyer and others by himself. He arranged other medical visits himself when he returned to Poland.

He agreed with counsel he would have been very familiar with arranging medical appointments because he had received €245,000 for a previous claim for a head injury in a work accident in 2010.

Asked had he made appointments on the basis that his ability to work was seriously compromised he replied: “The point I am trying to make is that because of the (2018) accident I am restricted in the things I am trying to do”.

There followed a number of exchanges between Mr Siry, Mr Walsh, and the judge about how many motorbikes he owned and when he used them. He agreed a photo Mr Walsh had was of him on a Suzuki motorbike at Poznan.

The judge told him “you are not doing yourself any good because I have to decide whether you are a reliable witness”.

The interpreter then said she was having difficulties interpreting and she agreed with Mr Walsh that Mr Siry was engaging in conversation with her and “trying to evaluate my interpretation”.

The judge told Mr Siry’s counsel he would adjourn briefly to give him an “opportunity to gather your skirts”.

Following the adjournment, Mr Tynan SC, for Mr Siry, said the case could be struck out.

The judge struck out the case and said the interpreter was to be commended for her efforts to assist the court.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...