The Role of Mediation in Personal Injury Claims: Understanding the PIRB’s New Approach

group of people sitting beside rectangular wooden table with laptops

26 April 2023

On 13th December 2022, President Michael D. Higgins signed the Personal Injuries Resolution Board Bill, which subsequently became law. This legislation modifies and expands the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003 – 2019, introducing several significant alterations.

  1. Name Change

The Personal Injuries Assessment Board will now be known as the Personal Injuries Resolution Board (PIRB). The new name signifies the board’s enhanced role in offering mediation as a method for settling claims.

  1. Mediation

The legislation outlines that mediation aims to resolve claims through agreements reached by the involved parties. Claimants can now apply to the PIRB for claim resolution via mediation, assessment, or a combination of both. However, all parties must agree to mediation. If they consent, a mediator will be appointed from a panel of mediators employed by the PIRB or by someone designated by the board.

Intriguingly, Section 9 empowers the PIRB to invite parties to contemplate mediation when it deems it suitable.

  1. Fraud Prevention

The legislation emphasises that applications to the PIRB must include the claimant’s Personal Public Service (PPS) number. If a claimant lacks a PPS number, the PIRB will require identity proof through relevant documentation. Failure to supply this information will lead to the statute of limitation continuing to run while the claim remains with the PIRB.

Section 22 states that knowingly or recklessly providing the board with false or misleading information is an offence. Additionally, Section 20 specifies that the board may report suspected offences to An Garda Síochána.

  1. Assessment of Complex Claims

The PIRB will now assess claims exclusively psychological in nature, representing a departure from the previous stance where the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) could choose not to evaluate such claims. The legislation also amends the procedures for assessing claims awaiting a long-term prognosis. With both claimant and respondent’s consent, the board can retain claims for up to two additional years beyond the initial nine months if a medical report verifies that a long-term prognosis will not be available within nine months.

  1. Costs

The legislation introduces cost protection for respondents by treating declined assessments as tender payments. If a respondent accepts an assessment but a claimant declines, it will be treated as an offer of tender payment. Consequently, if a claimant pursues litigation and the court’s award does not exceed the PIAB assessment, the claimant will be unable to recover their costs and will be liable for the respondent’s costs as well.

Furthermore, if a respondent neglects to pay the relevant fee to the board within the required timeframe, the board can impose an additional administrative charge. The bill even states that the respondent is liable to the board for all charges incurred in relation to the relevant claim.

Stay tuned for more updates on how this legislation will impact personal injury claims.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...