The Effects of New Personal Injury Guidelines and What to Do About It?

Eye Injury

10 August 2021

The eagerly awaited Personal Injuries Guidelines in Ireland are part of the Government’s Action Plan on Insurance. These were adopted by the Judicial Council on Saturday, 6 March 2021. The guidelines were implemented to achieve greater consistency in awards and reduce the damages in personal injury cases.

The guidelines are replacing the Book of Quantum in 2004 (last updated in 2016) and are a significant step toward quantifying damages in personal injury claims. In addition, they are covering a broader range of claims, including new categories of injuries and encompassing injuries experienced as a result of medical treatment.

Applying the new guidelines

When assessing a new personal injury case, the courts are now required to consider the guidelines. Courts may only depart from these measures where they are justified and must explain their reasoning in the judgment.

For cases already before the court, judges don’t need to apply the guidelines. The new guidelines have been met with some apprehension by legal professionals and judges. The Department of Justice is set to report on the impact of the guidelines by December 2021 and review them every three years.

Most categories of personal injury face reduced awards

In most categories, the levels of awards for personal injury are reduced. This is expected mostly in lower-scale personal injury claims. The result, a significant reduction in the cost of insurance.

According to the guidelines, the damages awarded must be comparable with the injuries sustained. However, if there are critical injuries, there is an increase in the highest award for general damages from €500,000 to €550,000.

Added personal injury categories

The introduction of new categories of injuries not previously included in the Book of Quantum is significant for medical lawsuits. Several of these new injuries result from medical treatments, and courts are required to take the relevant categories into account when awarding damages. This can mean better consistency for cases that involve certain facets of medical negligence. Depending on the level, minor or severe, damages are awarded based on a scale. Factors that judges must consider when determining the severity of the injury include the impact of the work, its interference on the quality of life, and the plaintiff’s age.

Reducing life expectancy

Sometimes, an injured party remains alive but claims for a reduced life expectancy. Here again, the guidelines set the relevant factors the court must consider and the maximum to be awarded. Again, reference is made to undiagnosed cancers, and the compensation awarded can be for pain, loss of life, and suffering due to the injury itself.

Injuries to the reproductive system

The guidelines also govern reproductive system damages in both males and females. Factors the courts must consider include the fertility of the woman, any interference with sexual function, psychological damage, impact on personal relationships, hormonal function, and menopause. Here, the number of damages for infertility claims also depends on the context of the injury, e.g., whether the person already has children.

Psychiatric damage is a new category

Not all psychiatric damage is liable for compensation, but awards are included for several levels of general psychiatric damages and depression. Additionally, compensation for PSTD depends on whether it is minor or severe.

What to do about it?

These guidelines are adaptable to medical claims, but these new injury categories present a two-fold effect. First, according to legal professionals, only a modest number of cases completely fall into the scope of the guidelines and might benefit from the consistency offered. Second, however, they feel that for most cases where the guidelines do not fully cover multi-layered claims, the courts and legal practitioners may be unable to value a claim.

Unfortunately, medical negligence litigation is complex to value because of the nature of the injuries. In addition, the plaintiffs often already have existing health issues. This type of difficulty often resulted in the Personal Injuries Board not being able to assess some cases. Time will show how these new guidelines will impact multifaceted claims.

Conclusion

So far, the guidelines appear to have had an impact. The percentage of awards has fallen to lower levels than the previous year, a drop that is hoped to lower insurance premiums for consumers. Something that is also expected to enhance competition in the Irish insurance market.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...