Teenager with cerebral palsy secures €12.5m settlement over ‘negligent’ decision at birth

19 July 2021

A 17-year-old boy with cerebral palsy has secured a final payment of €12.5m as settlement of his High Court action over the circumstances of his birth at Waterford Regional Hospital.

This brings to €15.6m the total paid to the young man who is a ward of court and cannot be identified.

The president of the High Court Ms Justice Mary Irvine today approved the final settlement payment of €12.5m which was reached after mediation and will go towards the teenager’s future care needs.

She said the settlement will give the young man the best quality of life and that he was now 17 years of age and a source of great joy to his family.

“The settlement will give him all he needs to live the best life he can,” she said in a remote ruling of the case.

Michael Counihan SC, instructed by Emmet Halley solicitor for the young man, told the court he is thriving and that was due to the care of his parents over the last number of years. The settlement, counsel said, will mean that he has enough to allow for his full care for the rest of his life.

The 17-year-old had already received a number of interim payments.

He had sued the HSE, alleging negligence in the circumstances of his birth in December 2003.

Circumstances around his birth

He was born by emergency Caesarean section when his mother was 28 weeks’ pregnant and, among various claims, it was alleged the decision to perform the emergency Caesarean was negligent.

It was also alleged the sodium level of the child’s blood had dropped unnoticed endangering the development of brain cells.

In 2013, a High Court judge ruled that a doctor’s diagnosis of abruption, which led to the decision to perform the Caesarean, was on the balance of probabilities wrong.

The decision to proceed to deliver by emergency Caesarean in a non-emergency situation was negligent, the judge ruled.

Settlement

The HSE had indicated it intended to appeal but then settled the case with future care needs set aside until now.

In an affidavit to the High Court today, the boy’s mother said her son suffered a series of complications associated with pre-term delivery including respiratory failure and depleted sodium in his blood stream. He was two years later diagnosed with cerebral palsy in all four limbs and later again with epilepsy.

Approving the latest final settlement sum in the High Court, Ms Justice Mary Irvine praised the wonderful support of the teenager’s parents and their extraordinary care for him. She wished the family all the best and every success in the future.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...