State dealing with 12 asbestos-related claims

Asbestos

10 January 2011

The State is currently dealing with 12 claims from people who say they were exposed to asbestos in publicly-owned properties, the State Claims Agency has confirmed.

Since the agency was established 10 years ago it has paid out €217,000 in settlements to two plaintiffs for asbestos-related claims.

It has also concluded approximately 520 asbestos “worried well” claims, the vast majority of which were discontinued or struck out.

The worried well claims refer to individuals who have not suffered any physical injury from asbestos exposure, but say they suffered worry and anxiety as a result of being exposed to asbestos in State-owned buildings. The vast majority of cases were taken by State employees.

Asbestos was widely used in the building industry for years for insulation and fire protection and in products such as cement roof sheets and ceiling and floor tiles. However, in the 1980s it became linked with illnesses such as lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma, a cancer of the chest and abdominal lining.

Asbestos becomes dangerous when its fibres are released into the air so its removal can trigger health fears.

Asked about the outcome of the “worried well” claims, the State Claims Agency said 84 per cent of claims had been discontinued or struck out. “A substantial sum of money, in respect of the State’s costs in these worried well actions, has been recovered and refunded to the State,” a State Claims Agency spokeswoman said.

She said the State had recovered “a six-figure sum” in these cases. “These claimants did not lose their cases, they discontinued them and this action made them liable for the State’s costs.”

The spokeswoman said the State Claims Agency had entered into confidentiality agreements with many plaintiffs so it was precluded from commenting further.

Of the concluded claims, a further 13 per cent were statute barred, ie, they had exceeded the time limit allowed for taking the case, while 2.5 per cent of cases were dismissed. She said the 12 ongoing cases were at various pre-litigation and litigation stages.

The Office of Public Works, which maintains State-owned buildings, began a major asbestos removal programme in 1999.

In one of its busiest years, 2007, it spent €42.5 million on asbestos removal and reinstatement works in schools, Garda stations, Government offices and other public buildings.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...