Solicitors abandon fight over complaint system

Four Courts, Dublin

22 February 2012

THE Law Society, the ruling body for solicitors, has abandoned its fight to retain control over the handling of complaints against members of the profession.

Instead, a new state regulatory agency is to investigate complaints against solicitors.

The society, which has regulated the solicitors’ profession under supervision of the courts for almost 150 years, insisted that the "fundamental change" in its position was not because of any inadequacies in the existing system.

"The society believes that its complaints handling has always been conducted to the highest standards of fairness and objectivity," said its president, Donald Binchy, in a special email bulletin issued to all solicitors last night.

The society, which is fighting a rearguard action against Justice Minister Alan Shatter’s controversial plans to overhaul the legal sector, said that it agreed to the change late last month because of the need to address the public perception that solicitors should not be investigating themselves.

Ruling

The move will put pressure on the Bar Council — the barrister’s ruling body — to make similar concessions to the Government.

Both ruling bodies, which also represent their members, have mounted opposition to some but not all elements of the Legal Services Regulatory Bill, which is currently going through the Dail. The bill will, if passed, strip both bodies of their investigative functions.

Until now, both branches of the profession had been united in their opposition to some of the more contentious elements of the bill. But last night’s announcement could drive a major rift between barristers and solicitors.

Mr Binchy said that despite the fact that a majority of lay people have, since 2009, been on its Complaints and Client Relations Committee, many members of the public viewed with suspicion the model where client complaints about a solicitor must be made to the Law Society.

The legal services bill, if passed, will refer all complaints by members of the public against both branches of the profession to a new quango, the Legal Services Regulatory Authority (LSRA).

The LSRA has been condemned internationally because of concerns that the Government will have too much direct control of the legal profession. Mr Shatter has indicated that he will bring amendments to the bill to address those concerns.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...