Solicitors concede they illegally deducted cash from victims of abuse

14 October 2005

A SOLICITORS’ firm has admitted ripping off victims of abuse.

Limerick firm Mc Mahon O’Brien Downes is the only one to come forward since it emerged some solicitors illegally deducted payments from clients’ compensation.

The firm, which last night admitted it overcharged clients, previously earned over €8.8m after defending 1,396 army deafness claims.

If it also overcharged any of these personal injury claimants by improperly deducting payments from compensation, it could be open to a massive claim for a return of those payments – plus interest.

Last night, it was also revealed that 35 victims of abuse who believe they were overcharged by solicitors have complained to the Law Society.

Earlier this week, the society’s director general Ken Murphy said it got only one complaint, but there has been a deluge of correspondence that culminated in 29 calls yesterday. 

Mr Ken Murphy of the Law Society said claimants against errant solicitors will get money back – with interest.

Callers to RTE’s Liveline show alleged that solicitors representing victims of abuse in residential institutions were paid twice. Mr Murphy warned criminal proceedings may be brought against solicitors found to have engaged in alleged overcharging.

The society has promised to fast-track all complaints about double-charging through its complaints system, stressing that people other than solicitors would be helping it with its probe. It said it would return funds as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, one of Ireland’s biggest abuse victim support groups has revealed it was aware of claims by members that they were ripped off a year ago.

Although the Law Society denied it failed to respond to the warning signs this week, there are claims it was generally aware of the scandal for months.

One in Four director Colm O’Gorman said it is aware of six allegations from members that part of their compensation payments were illegally withheld by solicitors.

Abuse victims’ legal costs are supposed to be covered in full by the body set up to probe abuse claims and award compensation – the Residential Institutions Redress Board.

It has also emerged that all personal injury claimants – not just abuse victims – could claim against solicitors who improperly took payment from their compensation. A legal expert has revealed that anyone whose solicitor took a percentage of their compensation claim as payment is entitled to their money back – with interest.

Dorothea Dowling, Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) head, said solicitors’ costs should be covered by the person or body being sued.

They had no right to look for ‘extras’.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...