Woman who slipped on spilled cream in Dunnes Stores awarded €75k

8 February 2019

A woman who slipped on spilled cream in a supermarket has been awarded €75,000 by the High Court.

Maureen Curran (64) was working at the time as a Glanbia rep visiting supermarkets when the accident occurred on September 3, 2013 in Dunnes Stores, Cavan town.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross said she suffered a nasty injury when she had a “sudden and helpless fall”.

Mrs Curran, Tymonville Court, Tallaght, Dublin, sued Dunnes Stores and Glanbia.

She claimed there was an alleged failure by Dunnes Stores to have an adequate cleaning system in operation.

There was also an alleged failure to warn her of the danger posed by the spillage.

She claimed against Glanbia that there was an alleged failure to take any or any adequate precautions for her safety while she was engaged in her work.

The claims were denied an a hearing took place over a day and a half in the High Court.

She told the court she walking in a normal manner along the dairy aisle when her legs went from under her and she slipped on a cream spillage which was being mopped up by staff.

“My feet went from under me. I landed sideways,” she said. The incident was captured on CCTV.

She said she got up but it was only when she reached for her phone, she realised her hand did not work as it should.

She had fractured her right wrist and still has to wear a splint most days, the court heard.

In his judgment awarding her €75,000, Mr Justice Cross said all witnesses in the case had given truthful evidence.

The accident, he said, did not occur when the floor was being cleaned by Dunnes Stores staff.

He found Dunnes had failed to have warning signs to mark out the extent of the spillage.

Mrs Curran saw the one warning sign which she presumed was the location of the spill and not where she slipped, he said.

The supermarket protocol says that warning signs should be left out until the floor is dry, he said.

It was vital to ensure the entire area of a floor was dry and this unfortunately was not done, he said.

He found no contributory negligence on the part of Ms Curran.

She did nothing the judge said that visitors to Dunnes Stores are not expected to do, that is walk up and down the aisle doing their business.

She was an honest woman who did not exaggerate her injuries, he said.

He found the loss of her job with Glanbia a year later was not related to her accident.

There was no doubt the accident had a severe effect on her, he added.

Source: Irish Independent

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...