Settlement of €200,000 for girl (12) who sued over alleged delay to hearing loss diagnosis

Four Courts Building. 1796-1802. Dublin, Ireland

5 August 2023

A 12-year-old girl who sued over an alleged five year delay in diagnosing her hearing loss has settled a High Court action for €200,000.

Caitlin Higgins, Kiltoom, Co Roscommon had sued the HSE over the alleged failure to provide her with adequate audiological care and treatment at a crucial time in her development.

Her counsel Hugh O’Keeffe SC with Doireann O’Mahony BL told the High Court the girl has done very well but it was a stressful time for her until she was given hearing aids four years ago.

In the proceedings which she brought through her mother Penny Higgins, it was claimed that the child in a general health check when she was seven months old failed a distraction test. It was claimed that at that stage she was not appropriately referred onwards for further assessment.

She was seen for her first assessment when she was nearly six years of age. This was on foot of a major review of audiology services which had taken place

The little girl was diagnosed with a mild high frequency sensorineural hearing loss in her right ear. She was recalled for review on in August 2017, when it was confirmed that she had mild high frequency hearing loss in both ears.

It was claimed the child did not have access to the full spectrum of speech sounds between birth and April 2019 when she was almost eight years of age and she was fitted with appropriate hearing aids.

She has a high frequency hearing loss and will require hearing aids throughout her life.

All the claims were denied.

Mr Justice Paul Coffey approved the settlement and said it was fair and reasonable.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...