Introduction
Welcome to the Irish Claims Board’s solicitor disciplinary records page. We believe that understanding solicitor conduct is crucial for anyone navigating the claims process. Remember, the Irish Claims Board offers a free assessment on claims—we should be your first port of call before engaging a solicitor. Our expert team is here to provide clear, unbiased advice, empowering you to make informed decisions without cost or commitment. This page highlights disciplinary records to help you stay aware of solicitor conduct and choose trustworthy professionals when needed.
Mary Miley Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow 18/01/2010 In the matter of Mary Miley, solicitor, formerly practising as Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, at Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [3916/DT18/09 and High Court record 2010 no 8SA] Law Society of Ireland (applicant) Mary Miley (respondent solicitor) On 17 June 2009, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found the respondent solicitor guilty of misconduct in her practice as a solicitor in that she: 1) Dishonestly held herself out as a person entitled to practise as a solicitor when she did not hold a current practising certificate, 2) Gave an undertaking to a named firm of solicitors by letter dated 30 August 2007 in circumstances where she did not hold a current practising certificate, 3) Gave an undertaking to a named firm of solicitors by letter dated 18 January 2008 in circumstances where she did not hold a current practising certificate, 4) Failed to reply to correspondence from a named firm of solicitors, dated 15 February 2008, 14 March 2008, 15 May 2008, 15 August 2008 and 4 September 2008, 5) Failed to comply with the undertaking given to a named firm of solicitors, dated 30 August 2007, in a timely manner or at all, 6) Failed to comply with the undertaking given to a named firm of solicitors, dated 18 January 2008, in a timely manner or at all. The tribunal ordered that the matter go forward to the High Court and, on 18 January 2010, the President of the High Court made the following orders: 1) That the name of the respondent solicitor shall be struck from the Roll of Solicitors, 2) That the respondent solicitor, within 14 days of the making of this order, submit to the Society proposals to the satisfaction of the Society for the orderly disposition of all files and documents, including title deeds, in her possession or control or within her procurement arising from her practice as a solicitor, 3) That the respondent solicitor disclose on affidavit, within 14 days of the making of this order, what files and documents, including title deeds, are in her possession or control or within her procurement arising from her practice as a solicitor and the current whereabouts, or last known whereabouts, of any specific file or documentation or title deeds notified by the Society to her and, in particular, as detailed in the affidavit on behalf of the Society sworn on 21 December 2009, 4) That the respondent solicitor make herself available before the court should the Society so require, on a specified dated and at a specified time, for oral examination under oath in relation to the contents of any affidavit sworn by her pursuant to the order of the court, 5) If necessary, an order pursuant to section 8(1)(c)(v) of the 1960 act, as substituted and amended, that the respondent solicitor forthwith deliver up to the Society’s nominee all files and documents, including title deeds, in her possession or control or within her procurement arising from her practice as a solicitor, which files and documents to be dealt with by the Society pursuant to the provisions of section 19 of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act 1960, as amended by substitution by section 27 of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act 1994, 6) That the respondent solicitor, within 24 hours of the making of this order, surrender her passport to the registrar, 7) That the Law Society do recover for the costs of the proceedings herein and the costs of the proceedings as against the respondent solicitor before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, to be taxed in default of agreement.Details for Mary Miley
Name
Address
Date of Order
Decision