Solicitor Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions

Introduction

Welcome to the Irish Claims Board’s solicitor disciplinary records page. We believe that understanding solicitor conduct is crucial for anyone navigating the claims process. Remember, the Irish Claims Board offers a free assessment on claims—we should be your first port of call before engaging a solicitor. Our expert team is here to provide clear, unbiased advice, empowering you to make informed decisions without cost or commitment. This page highlights disciplinary records to help you stay aware of solicitor conduct and choose trustworthy professionals when needed.

Back to list

Details for Joseph Traynor

Name

Joseph Traynor

Address

Traynor & Company, Solicitors, 86 Clanbrassil Street, Dundalk, Co Louth

Date of Order

05/07/2010

Decision

In the matter of Joseph Traynor, solicitor, formerly practising as Traynor & Company, Solicitors, 86 Clanbrassil Street, Dundalk, Co Louth, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [5554/DT11/10 and High Court record no 2010 no 55 SA]

Law Society of Ireland (applicant)

Joseph Traynor (respondent solicitor)

On 11 May 2010, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found the respondent solicitor guilty of misconduct in his practice as a solicitor in that he:

a) Failed to honour an undertaking given to the complainant on behalf of a named client for property at Lislin, Mullagh, Co Cavan, dated 31 August 2007, in which he undertook to register the mortgage of the complainant in the appropriate registry and to ensure that the lender/complainant obtained a first legal mortgage on the property and, as soon as practical thereafter, to lodge with the lender/complainant all deeds and documents properly stamped and registered as appropriate together with the original mortgage,

b) Failed to reply adequately to the complainant’s correspondence and to the complainant’s solicitors’ correspondence, in particular letters dated 9 December 2008, 9 January 2009, 28 January 2009, 16 February 2009 and 26 February 2009,

c) Failed to adequately respond to the Society’s correspondence, in particular letters dated 5 May 2009 and 20 May 2009,

d) Failed to attend or arrange representation before the Complaints and Client Relations Committee meeting on 9 October 2009, despite being directed to attend.

The tribunal directed:

a) That the respondent solicitor is not a fit person to be a member of the solicitors’ profession,

b) That the name of the respondent solicitor be struck off the Roll of Solicitors,

c) That the respondent solicitor pay the sum of €570,000 as restitution to Start Mortgages,

d) That the respondent solicitor pay the whole of the costs of the Law Society of Ireland, including witness expenses, to be taxed by a taxing master of the High Court in default of agreement.

The tribunal directed that the matter be referred forward to the High Court and, on 5 July 2010, the President of the High Court ordered:

1) That the name of the respondent solicitor be struck from the Roll of Solicitors,

2) That the respondent solicitor pay the sum of €570,000 as restitution to Start Mortgages Limited,

3) That the applicant forward the papers in respect of this application to the Director of Public Prosecutions,

4) That the respondent solicitor surrender his passport forthwith to An Garda Síochána,

5) That the respondent solicitor pay the applicant the costs of the High Court proceedings, together with the costs of the disciplinary tribunal proceedings, to include witness expenses, to be taxed in default of agreement.