Solicitor Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions

Introduction

Welcome to the Irish Claims Board’s solicitor disciplinary records page. We believe that understanding solicitor conduct is crucial for anyone navigating the claims process. Remember, the Irish Claims Board offers a free assessment on claims—we should be your first port of call before engaging a solicitor. Our expert team is here to provide clear, unbiased advice, empowering you to make informed decisions without cost or commitment. This page highlights disciplinary records to help you stay aware of solicitor conduct and choose trustworthy professionals when needed.

Back to list

Details for Oliver Hanrahan

Name

Oliver Hanrahan

Address

Hanrahan Rynne Solicitors, 3B Riverside Business Park, Ennis, Co Clare

Date of Order

26/01/2015

Decision

In the matter of Oliver Hanrahan, solicitor, formerly practising as Hanrahan Rynne Solicitors, 3B Riverside Business Park, Ennis, Co Clare, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [9381/DT12/14 and High Court record 2014 no 150 SA]

Law Society of Ireland (applicant)

Oliver Hanrahan (respondent solicitor)

On 18 June 2014, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found the respondent solicitor guilty of misconduct in his practice as a solicitor in that he:

1)   Failed to comply expeditiously, within a reasonable time, or at all with an undertaking given by him in respect of named clients over property at Clarecastle, Co Clare, to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 21 April 2008,

2)   Failed to respond adequately or at all to the complainant’s correspondence in respect of his undertaking given on behalf of named clients over property at Clarecastle, Co Clare, to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 21 April 2008 and, in particular, letters dated 23 February 2010, 1 March 2010, 29 June 2010, 23 September 2010 and 24 May 2011 respectively,

3)   Failed to comply with the directions of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee meeting of 26 June 2012, which directed him to file a report on all outstanding undertakings/complaints with the Society by 23 July 2012,

4)   Through his failure to comply with the directions of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee meeting of 26 June 2012, caused the Society to re-enter a section 10 application to the President of the High Court on 23 July 2012,

5)   Failed to comply with the directions of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee on 16 October 2012 to furnish documentation and information in respect of complaints within 21 days to the Society,

6)   Failed to comply with the directions of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee at its meeting on 11 December 2012, despite a stay of four months being imposed,

7)   Failed to comply expeditiously, within a reasonable time, or at all with an undertaking given by him in respect of named clients over property at Thurles, Tipperary South, given to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 18 August 2005,

8)   Failed to reply adequately or at all to the complainant’s correspondence in respect of an undertaking given by him on behalf of named clients over property at Thurles, Tipperary South, given to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 18 August 2005 and, in particular, letters dated 30 June 2006, 29 December 2006, 5 February 2008, 26 February 2008, 18 March 2009, 8 April 2009, 23 February 2010, 1 March 2010, 29 June 2010, 23 September 2010, 24 May 2011 and 15 June 2011 respectively,

9)   Failed to comply expeditiously, within a reasonable time, or at all with an undertaking given by him in respect of named clients over property at Clybaun, Co Galway, given to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 11 November 2005,

10) Failed to reply adequately or at all to the complainant’s correspondence in respect of an undertaking given by him on behalf of named clients over property at Clybaun, Co Galway, given to Bank of Ireland Mortgages on 11 November 2005 and, in particular, letters dated 28 November 2006, 29 May 2007, 27 November 2007, 3 December 2008, 30 December 2008, 23 February 2010, 1 March 2010, 23 September 2010, 24 May 2011 and 15 June 2011 respectively.

The tribunal ordered that the matter go forward to the High Court and, on 26 January 2015, the President of the High Court ordered that the name of the respondent solicitor shall be struck from the Roll of Solicitors.