Solicitor Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions

Introduction

Welcome to the Irish Claims Board’s solicitor disciplinary records page. We believe that understanding solicitor conduct is crucial for anyone navigating the claims process. Remember, the Irish Claims Board offers a free assessment on claims—we should be your first port of call before engaging a solicitor. Our expert team is here to provide clear, unbiased advice, empowering you to make informed decisions without cost or commitment. This page highlights disciplinary records to help you stay aware of solicitor conduct and choose trustworthy professionals when needed.

Back to list

Details for James J Maher

Name

James J Maher

Address

James Maher & Co, Solicitors, 1 The Bookend, Essex Quay, Dublin 8

Date of Order

16/03/2015

Decision

In the matter of James J Maher, solicitor, practising as James Maher & Co, Solicitors, 1 The Bookend, Essex Quay, Dublin 8, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [6676/DT82/12 and High Court record 2015/4SA]

Law Society of Ireland (applicant)

James J Maher (respondent solicitor)

On 2 October 2014, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found the respondent solicitor guilty of misconduct in his practice as a solicitor in that he:

1)   Misappropriated circa €242,219.99 of client moneys by paying these moneys to a third party,

2)   Failed to disclose the said misappropriations until the Society initiated an inspection of his practice,

3)   Caused or permitted significant non-offsettable debit balances to arise on client ledger accounts, in breach of regulation 7(2)(a) of the Solicitors Accounts Regulations 2001.

The tribunal ordered that the matter go forward to the High Court and, on 16 March 2015, the President of the High Court ordered:

1)   That the respondent remain suspended from practice until such time as he secures a superior who will employ him and who is approved by the Society,

2)   Thereafter, the respondent not be permitted to practise as a sole practitioner or in partnership; that he be permitted only to practise as an assistant solicitor in the employment and under the direct control and supervision of another solicitor of at least ten years’ standing, to be approved in advance by the Society,

3) That the respondent solicitor be prohibited from signing any cheques or authorising any bank payment, either solely or jointly over any client account,

4)   That a copy of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal report be furnished to any prospective legal practitioner wishing to employ the respondent solicitor,

5)   That the respondent solicitor pay the sum of €5,000 as a contribution towards the whole of the costs of the Society, to be paid from any surplus that should arise after all client moneys have been returned,

6)   The court makes no order as to costs of the High Court application.