Retiring judge fears personal injury case changes benefit those ‘with deep pockets’

Mr Justice Cross

21 November 2021

A senior judge retiring after a decade handling the personal injuries list has said he fears recent and proposed changes in practice will have the effect of changing the system designed to get a case to the door of a court quickly with “a war of attrition” type scenario.

And Mr Justice Kevin Cross warned the only winners in such a scenario are “battalions with deep pockets”. The judge, who was speaking from the bench as tributes were made on his retirement, said the practice of having pre-trial motions, motions for discovery and written submissions can be very good in cases where everyone has deep pockets. But he said they can have serious negative effects in ordinary cases.

Mr Justice Cross who presided over the Ruth Morrissey and other cervical cancer cases referred to a case involving a woman whose action included aspects of law, liability, causation and quantum within weeks of first going to a solicitor was in court. He said she succeeded to get her case on because of her courage and determination and that of her legal team and also because of the cooperation of the defendant legal teams in a system of trust.

The scales of justice, he said, must be continually rebalanced and adapted in order to ensure they are back in equilibrium as left to their own accord the scales of justice will invariably “tip in favour of the vested interests and big battalions”. 

The judge, who was first called to the Bar in 1975, in his retirement speech paid tribute to his courts registrar Margaret Mulligan and his tipstaff Martin McCarthy who had helped keep the personal injuries list running smoothly during the pandemic.

Tributes to Mr Justice Cross were, due to Covid restrictions, heard by selected representatives of various legal bodies, judges and the judge’s family and was broadcast via Zoom also.

Attorney General Paul Gallagher said Judge Cross will be long remembered for his judgement in the Ruth Morrissey cervical cancer case and the Russell case which deals with the real rate of return. He said the judge had always displayed kindness, humanity and equity and he treated all those before him with compassion.

He said the judge on retirement intends to do a PhD on Irish lawyer and statesman John Philpot Curran. Tributes were also given in Court one of the Four Courts by the Bar Council and Law Society.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...