Owners of husky-type dog that attacked boy during hurling training must pay €95,000 compensation

A boy who was attacked by a husky-type dog as he played hurling on a GAA pitch has settled his High Court action for €95,000.

Aaron Heavey-Sharpe suffered multiple lacerations to his lower legs and has been left with permanent and significant scarring after the attack by the Alaskan Malamute dog, Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told.

The boy’s counsel Gabriel Gavigan SC, instructed by Feargal White solicitor, told the court Aaron was on the pitch when the dog ran onto the grass and attacked and bit him savagely.

Aaron (16) of Derreens, Carragh, Co Kildare, had, through his father Niall Sharpe, sued the dog owners Joseph and Edwina Murphy of Donore, Naas, Co Kildare, over the attack on the Éire Óg Corra Choill hurling club sports pitch at Donore on January 27, 2019.

Aaron was 12 at the time and was hurling training when it was claimed the dog attacked him and bit him several times on his lower limbs.

It was claimed that the dog had escaped from the Murphy premises and entered the GAA pitch.

It was further claimed there was a failure to adequately control or restrain the dog and a failure to take any or any reasonable care to see that the boy or any other person would be reasonably safe near their premises or on the pitch.

The court heard that liability was admitted in the case.

Aaron, following the attack, was taken to Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, where he had to have surgery under general anaesthetic to repair his legs.

He had seven puncture wounds on his inner left thigh as well as large wounds and other lacerations on his right leg. He was in hospital for two days and had to use crutches for a time afterwards.

It was claimed the boy was traumatised by the attack.

Counsel told the court the boy had a fear of dogs for a while after the attack, but his family got a dog to help him overcome the fear.

Counsel said he also had difficulty running but he had since overcome that and hopes to get back to playing Gaelic games in the future.

Mr Justice Coffey, who inspected the scarring, said it was quite significant.

However, he said Aaron was a very resilient young man.

The judge was satisfied the settlement offer was fair and reasonable and he had no hesitation in approving it.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...