No reason to up costs, insurance firms told

18 October 2007

October 18 2007

INSURANCE companies claim to have cut motor insurance premiums by up to 10pc this year and have been warned there is little justification for future increases.

A survey by consultants Deloitte showed that 80pc of insurers said that they had cut premiums in 2007, the majority by up to 10pc, while one-in-10 had raised prices and the remainder had kept them at 2006 levels.

But motor insurers were split as to whether prices will rise or fall next year, with 40pc predicting drivers were likely to see price increases of up to 10pc in 2008, and the same number predicted reductions by that amount.

However, Deloitte said their research indicated uncertainty among industry players about profitability and noted companies might have to accept that the higher profits experienced in previous years might now be a thing of the past.

"We believe that motor insurance companies will come under pressure to decrease premiums — as the general public becomes more sympathetic with road safety measures and the PIAB [Personal Injuries Assessment Board] continues to have a positive impact on compensation culture, there will be very little justification for increased premiums," said Glenn Gillard of Deloitte.

"This will ultimately affect profitability — the recent years of exceptional profits may well be over," he told a Deloitte seminar on motor insurance.

While the car market continued to grow, increased competition and more shopping around by consumers meant only two major companies — FBD and Quinn — had increased their market share over the last year, said Dick Tulloch, Director of Actuarial Services with Deloitte.

The Insurance Statistical Review 2006 showed healthy profits in motor insurance, albeit not as high as in the past, but this did not always reflect their underwriting performance as insurance companies had released a significant amount of reserves.

"This begs the question as to how many reserves are left to be released — and will companies be able to maintain profits in this way in coming years?" said Mr Tulloch.

There were mixed feelings in the industry with 45pc of those surveyed more optimistic than last year, and 35pc more gloomy about prospects.

However, over 70pc were more optimistic about road safety and believed the PIAB was having a positive impact on compensation culture.

There is set to be more cars on the road than drivers by 2009 if current trends continue with the number of vehicles insured growing by 5pc per year said Mr Tulloch.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...