New guidelines on personal injury awards do not change the law, says judge

Barrister's Wig

23 April 2021

The High Court judge who manages personal injuries litigation has stressed that new guidelines aimed at reducing damages, especially for minor injuries, “do not change the law”.

Judges are still required to assess damages that are “fair and reasonable” in individual cases, Mr Justice Kevin Cross said.

The judge also noted on Thursday there is a “great lacuna” in the court’s personal injuries list for the rest of this law term to May 20th.

The judge, who manages the court’s personal injuries list and the daily callover of cases via video conference, told lawyers there were very few cases listed before the court for hearing or settlement up to May 20th.

If any lawyers wished to set down a case for a virtual hearing, or settlement, that would be welcome as the lack of cases meant he was currently “underemployed”, he said.

Any cases listed for the next court term, beginning on June 2nd, will proceed via remote hearing, if required, or via physical hearing, if required, he added.

Thursday’s personal injuries list listed six cases. The first case was fixed for hearing on June 30th. Of the remaining five cases, all listed for mention, the judge was told two had settled and he made various orders in those. The remaining three were adjourned.

A small number of other matters which were not listed were mentioned, including a case which James Nerney BL said could be impacted by the new personal injuries guidelines.

Because of Brexit, counsel said he is now required to apply to serve papers on a UK based defendant outside the jurisdiction and wanted liberty in that regard.

Granting liberty to do so on Friday, the judge said the new guidelines “do not change the law”.

Judges are still required to assess damages that are fair and reasonable, he said. If a judge believes it is necessary to depart from the guidelines to do so, all that judge needs to do is give their reasons for doing so, he said.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...