Woman awarded €5m over negligence at Sligo hospital

Medical

14 December 2017

The family of a 60-year-old woman left almost completely blind and partially paralysed due to a delay in diagnosing a brain aneurysm have said they hope a court settlement will allow her to spend Christmas next year at home.

Bernadette Surlis, from Drinaum, Strokestown in Co Roscommon, is confined to a wheelchair and is in a nursing home.

The High Court was told her "only remaining ambition" was to go home.

The court approved a settlement of €5 million in her action against the Health Service Executive over negligence in her care and treatment at Sligo General Hospital in November 2013.

Senior Counsel Michael Cush said it was hoped the settlement in this "very sad case" would mean Ms Surlis' ambition would be achieved.

He told the court that liability was admitted.

Mr Cush said it was accepted that had Ms Surlis been appropriately and promptly diagnosed and treated, she would not have suffered the injuries.

Ms Surlis went to the hospital on 3 November 2013 complaining of a headache, vomiting and a dilated pupil in her left eye.

She was assessed as "Category 3" in triage, meaning she was not treated as an immediate emergency and was left waiting for three hours. 

The court heard she was investigated for glaucoma and discharged.

Ms Surlis went back to hospital the next day when the severity of her condition was appreciated for the first time, the court heard.

She was transferred to Beaumont Hospital on 5 November, but the court was told it was too late at that stage as she had suffered a haemorrhage and permanent brain injury.

She will need full-time care and Mr Cush said the consensus among experts was that her condition will only marginally improve.

She is aware of her condition and has difficulties communicating but can do so with her family's help.

The court heard that if she had been moved to Beaumont when she first went to hospital, she probably would have been treated successfully and recovered fully.

Ms Surlis has three adult children and four sisters living locally. 

The court heard the entire family shares her determination to go home.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross said the settlement was a "reasonable and very good one".

He said the money would provide the best compensation possible for Ms Surlis to live out her life, hopefully in her own home.

Her children, accompanied by the family's solicitor, Damien Tansey, said it had been a long and difficult few years since 2013.

They welcomed the settlement and hoped it would ensure she would spend Christmas 2018 at home. 

Carla Surlis said they had lost their mam and what had happened had torn apart their whole family.

She said it had been a long few years without her and once she was home it would be better.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...