Musgrave joins action seeking redress from credit card firms

3 August 2021

SuperValu and Centra franchise owner Musgrave is joining a legal action seeking compensation from Visa and Mastercard for charging fees in breach of competition laws.

British courts ruled last year that so-called interchange fees imposed by Visa and Mastercard on retailers for every card transaction were a breach of both EU and UK competition laws.

Musgrave has told its retail franchise partners that it is joining a legal action seeking compensation from the two card companies for the fees, following the precedent set by the original case, which was taken by British chain Sainsbury’s and others.

Several retail groups are taking the claim in the British courts. Law firm Stephenson Harwood and consultants CMS Payments Intelligence (CMSPI) are advising the plaintiffs. Musgrave did not name its fellow litigants.

UK courts

The Irish group is opting to take the claim in the UK courts as it believes this gives it the best chance of receiving compensation for paying anticompetitive interchange fees.

The original ruling in the Sainsbury’s case, which established that the interchange fees were uncompetitive, covers a period when the UK was still part of the EU. The judgment notes that the British court is bound to follow European law.

Musgrave is inviting franchise partners to join the action, but stresses that each needs to decide for themselves whether they want to participate. The company notes that it cannot give legal advice or direction in relation to this decision.

“There will be no upfront costs for joining the claim, or costs if the claim is not successful in achieving a settlement. However, all parties to this class action will pay fees in line with those agreed with both CMSPI (payment specialists) and Stephenson Harwood (law firm) in the event of a successful claim,” Musgrave says.

It adds that the fees are expected to be no greater than 40 per cent of any settlement received from the card companies.

Musgrave cautions that there could be an industry-wide compensation scheme in the future but joining the class action would rule retailers out of taking part in any such programme.

“However, we are currently not aware of any such redress compensation scheme being proposed or planned,” Musgrave adds.

EU law 

Musgrave’s brands include SuperValu, Centra, Mace, Donnybrook Fair, La Rousse and others. The group is one of the biggest players in the Irish grocery market.

In 2020, the UK supreme court held that interchange fees charged by Visa Europe Services LLC and Mastercard Incorporated were an unlawful restriction of competition under article 101(1) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. This bans agreements that prevent, restrict or distort competition.

The ruling upheld a 2018 finding by the UK court of appeal in a case taken by Sainsbury’s, Asda, Argos and Morrisons against the two card companies, which ran for several years.

The judgment followed a ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union, which in turn upheld a decision by the European Commission that the fees were unlawful.

Banks which issued cards to consumers charged multi-lateral interchange fees on each transaction. The retailer’s bank paid the fee, charging it back to the retailer, which bore the cost.

The British court found that, as the interchange fee was set by a collective decision between the banks and card companies, rather than by competition in the market, retailers could not negotiate with their own banks to reduce the charge. Thus the system breached EU and UK competition law.

Musgrave said at the weekend that it did not comment on legal matters.

Source: Irish Times

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...