Man secures €46,000 settlement after metal shutter fell on his head

A man who suffered a minor head injury after a heavy metal shutter fell on his head at a Dunnes Stores outlet has secured €46,000 under a settlement of his High Court action.

Patrick McMahon was a part-time employee of Dunnes at the time of the accident at the retail firm’s premises in Newbridge, Co Kildare, on March 20th, 2017.

Through his sister Mary McMahon, of Maddenstown, Curragh, Co Kildare, Mr McMahon (46) sued Dunnes Stores’ (Georges Street ) Unlimited Company over the accident.

In an affidavit, Ms McMahon said her brother has Downs Syndrome, hypothyroidism and suffered a cerebrovascular accident in 2014, three years before the shutter accident. Mr McMahon was walking through a doorway when a heavy metal shutter dropped and struck him on the head, she said.

A report from a GP stated Ms McMahon’s brother sustained a graze to his forehead, did not lose consciousness and attended K-Doc on the day of the accident, where he was diagnosed with a minor head injury. In light of his history of cardiovascular disease, he underwent a CT scan of the brain to rule out any new cardiovascular event and that scan was normal.

Ms McMahon referred to further medical reports, including one of January 2020 in which the GP stated Mr McMahon had complained of intermittent daily headaches and expressed the view his symptoms of headaches, dizziness and poor balance have deteriorated since the 2017 accident. The GP noted brain imaging carried out following the accident showed no new findings.

Ms McMahon said she and her mother are satisfied any of her brother’s ongoing symptoms are referable to his complicated medical situation rather than to the injuries suffered in the shutter accident.

On Monday, counsel for Mr McMahon noted the new guidelines governing awards for personal injuries provide for awards up to €21,000 for a minor head injury with no loss of consciousness and for awards between €19-34,000 for moderate head injuries with no loss of consciousness.

Counsel said her side considered the €46,000 offer was a very good one and was asking the court to approve it.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons noted Mr McMahon has other conditions and his sister and mother are satisfied the injuries from which he is now suffering did not arise from this accident. Mr McMahon has retired from his part-time employment in Dunnes, he noted.

The judge was satisfied this was a good offer representing the full value of the claim.

There was no point in going to trial as Mr McMahon would not do better and he could get less, he said.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...