Man awarded €2.85m after suffering life-changing injuries when van was deliberately driven into him

four courts, dublin

21 December 2021

A 30-year-old man who suffered life-changing injuries when a van was deliberately driven at him on a street has settled his High Court action for €2.85million.

Father-of-two Stephen Roche was catastrophically injured and was in a coma for 16 days after the incident on the Main Street at Edgeworthstown, Co Longford four years ago.

The van, a court previously heard, was driven in a circle around Mr Roche and another man and on the second circle, the driver drove at Mr Roche and knocked him over.

Mr Roche’s counsel Sara Moorhead SC today told the High Court it was a very tragic case. Counsel said there had been an altercation earlier in the night and the van driver deliberately drove at Mr Roche who suffered severe injuries.

In June 2020, Aaron Cassidy (29) of Cranleymore, Edgeworthstown, Co Longford was jailed for dangerous driving causing serious bodily harm to Mr Roche on September 10, 2017. Cassidy was also disqualified from driving for 10 years.

Cassidy was sentenced to six years with the last twelve months suspended. The Court of Appeal later dismissed Cassidy’s appeal against the sentence.

Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told today a large part of the settlement will go toward Mr Roche’s future care needs.

The settlement is against the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI), which compensates victims of uninsured or untraced drivers. Cassidy was uninsured at the time.

Mr Roche, of Mullingar, Co Westmeath, had through his sister Tracey Golden sued the MIBI and Aaron Cassidy as a result of the incident.

He had claimed he was a pedestrian on the Main Street at Edgeworthstown when suddenly and without warning, the van driven by Cassidy collided with him.

He further claimed the driver was driving too fast in all the circumstances, without due care and attention and in a dangerous manner. He claimed there was also a failure to drive at an appropriate speed or with appropriate care and caution.

The van, he said, had been driven without regard for Mr Roche’s safety.

After he was knocked down, Mr Roche was brought to Mullingar General Hospital and he was later transferred to Beaumont Hospital, Dublin.

The Court of Appeal in dismissing Cassidy’s appeal against sentence earlier this year, and on hearing of the life-changing injuries suffered by Mr Roche, said it was “entirely correct to place the offence near the highest end of the spectrum”.

The court had heard Mr Roche suffered ongoing health problems including dizziness, blurred vision as well as difficulties with reading and writing and he will be on anti-epilepsy medicine for the rest of his life.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...