Jury fails to reach agreement in Michael Lynn’s multimillion-euro theft case

Michael Lynn Solicitor

7 June 2022

The jury in the multimillion-euro theft trial of former solicitor Michael Lynn has been discharged after failing to reach a verdict.

Following more than 12 hours of deliberations in the wake of the 3½ month trial, the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court was told on Wednesday that the panel had been unable to come to a majority verdict.

Mr Lynn (53), of Millbrook Court, Red Cross, Co Wicklow, had pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of theft of some €27 million in Dublin between October 23rd, 2006 and April 20th, 2007, when he was working as a solicitor and property developer.

It was the prosecution case that Mr Lynn obtained multiple mortgages on the same properties in a situation where banks were unaware that other institutions were also providing finance. These properties included ‘Glenlion’ – Mr Lynn’s €5.5 million home in Howth – and multiple investment properties.

The financial institutions involved were Bank of Ireland, National Irish Bank (later known as Danske Bank), Irish Life and Permanent, Ulster Bank, ACC Bank, Bank of Scotland Ireland Ltd and Irish Nationwide Building Society.

Mr Lynn took the stand for nine days and told his trial that the banks were aware he had multiple loans on the same properties and that this was “custom and practice” among bankers in Celtic Tiger Ireland.

He said he had “secret deals” with a number of bankers, who gave him permission to use the loan money for his property developments abroad. He told the court that he and former Irish Nationwide chief executive Michael Fingleton were involved in a secret profit share agreement in relation to a property development in Portugal.

Counsel for Mr Lynn told the jury that if more bankers had acted prudently back in 2007 “maybe more of them would be in business today”.

However, the prosecution argued that Mr Lynn had tried to divert blame for what had happened on to the courts, senior bankers including the late Sean FitzPatrick, the Brazilian and Irish authorities and “the world and his wife” but not himself.

The jury told Judge Martin Nolan they would not be able to reach a verdict if given more time and he said he had no other option but to discharge the members, who he thanked for their service. Mr Lynn made no reaction when the jury said it was unable to reach a verdict.

Prosecution counsel asked for a mention date in the next court term in order to get directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions. Judge Nolan adjourned the matter until June 20th and remanded Mr Lynn on continuing bail until then.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...