Judicial conduct guidelines to close ‘gap in judicial accountability’

Judicial Council

21 July 2021

Judicial conduct and ethics guidelines to be adopted shortly by the Judicial Council will close a “gap in judicial accountability and transparency”, Chief Justice Frank Clarke has said.

Writing in the foreword to its annual report for 2020, Mr Justice Clarke – who is due to retire in October – said the establishment of the Judicial Council in December 2019 was “an important and historic occasion”.

He said: “Central to the Council’s functions is the promotion and maintenance of public confidence in the judiciary and the administration of justice in this country. In striving to attain this goal judicial excellence is key.

“As chairperson of the Board of the Council, I have witnessed the manner in which the judiciary has embraced the vision of the Judicial Council through engagement with its work programmes and the significant achievements of its committees in their first year.

“The Board, the committees and indeed innumerable judges individually, were actively involved in supporting the Judicial Council in 2020 and I am grateful for my colleagues’ engagement and commitment.”

He said draft guidelines governing judicial conduct and ethics and procedures for making complaints, including managing findings of misconduct, would be finalised by the Board “during the first half of 2021” and proposed to the Council.

Mr Justice Clarke also highlighted the work of the sentencing guidelines and information committee, which is now completing “wide-ranging and hugely significant work”.

However, he said judges could benefit the most from new support mechanisms, the “most significant” of which is the creation of a dedicated learning and development facility for the judiciary.

“We have long looked enviously at the offerings in this area provided in neighbouring jurisdictions and I am delighted to say that Ireland has now planned for, built the foundations of and commenced rolling out an education programme to judges which is fit for purpose,” he said.

Welcoming the report, Justice Minister Heather Humphreys said: “The ambitious programme of work carried out by the Council, and its Committees, to fulfil their mandate was done so diligently and to the highest standards in 2020.

“I am confident that the Council will continue to play a crucial role in ensuring the high levels of public confidence in our judiciary and will maintain the high standards of excellence for which our judiciary is renowned the world over.”

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...