Irish Mother & Baby Homes Redress Scheme opens to applicants

woman in white shirt carrying baby

21 March 2024

On the 27th of February 2024, the Irish Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Roderic O’Gorman confirmed that the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme would open for applications on 20 March 2024. It is now open and applications can be made online or by post.

Minister O’Gorman noted that the Payment Scheme Office will process all applications as quickly as possible, with the first payments expected to be made in Quarter 2 of this year. The Payment Scheme will give priority to applications according to the age of the applicant, and so applications from older people will be prioritised.

The Payment Scheme is a key element of the Irish Government’s Action Plan for Survivors and Former Residents of Mother and Baby and County Home Institutions.

There are three benefits available under the Payment Scheme:

  • a general payment;
  • a work-related payment; and
  • health supports.

The level of the financial payment will depend on the amount of time spent in one of the institutions.

The health supports will be either:

  • an enhanced medical card; or
  • for people living outside of Ireland only, a health support payment valued at €3,000, instead of the enhanced medical card.

The enhanced medical card will entitle the holder to the following services, without charge, under the public health system in Ireland: –

  • GP services;
  • prescribed drugs, medicines, aids and appliances;
  • dental, ophthalmic (services to help with eye diseases) and aural (hearing) services;
  • home nursing;
  • home support;
  • counselling;
  • chiropody/podiatry (feet issues); and
  • physiotherapy.

Survivors will qualify for a payment based solely on proof of residency and will not need any evidence of abuse suffered at the institution.

However, even at this early stage the Payments Scheme has been publicly criticised. Dr Maeve O’Rourke who is lecturer at University of Galway lecturer, a co-director of the Clann Project and who was one of the experts appointed by the Northern Ireland Executive to work in partnership with victims and survivors of Mother and Baby and Magdalene Laundry Institutions to establish the terms of reference for a fully independent investigation into these institutions in Northern Ireland, has described the situation as “unconstitutional discrimination”. She says that the requirement by the Irish Government that an applicant to the Payments Scheme has to have been kept in one of the institutions for more than six months means that “…about two-thirds of the people still alive who were born in the institutions are not eligible at all”. Dr O Rourke added that “…we’ve actually advised people to seek legal advice. I don’t actually think this scheme will survive constitutional litigation, but that isn’t something that people should be forced to do”.

Minister O’Gorman has also announced the appointment of the former CEO of the Adoption Authority of Ireland Patricia Carey to the role of Special Advocate for Survivors. The appointment of a Special Advocate for Survivors fulfils another core commitment in the Government’s Action Plan, which recognises that the response of Irish Government to the legacy of these institutions must be directly informed by the voices of those most centrally affected.

Ms Carey will take up her role as Special Advocate from 25 March and her remit includes Mother-and-Baby Institutions, County Homes, Magdalen Laundries, Industrial and Reformatory Schools, and related institutions, and those adopted, boarded out, or the subject of an illegal birth registration.

Recent redress/payment schemes in various jurisdictions have been the subject of much criticism so it will be interesting to monitor whether this scheme faces similar challenges now it is open.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...