Insurance industry has ‘run out of excuses’ for not reducing premiums

Neon Insurance Office Sign

10 April 2024

The insurance industry has “run out of excuses” not to give policyholders substantial reductions in their premiums after a landmark ruling in the Supreme Court.

The court found that guidelines on personal injury awards, voted into force by Ireland’s judges three years ago, are legally binding and remain in force, in a ruling that will affect thousands of personal injury cases currently awaiting judicial analysis.

“The case is thus of systemic importance,” Supreme Court judge Peter Charleton said.

Waterford woman Bridget Delaney challenged the 2021 guidelines, which have seen awards for pain and suffering reduced by up to 40%.

She claimed the guidelines were unconstitutional and amounted to an encroachment on judicial independence, but this has been rejected by the Supreme Court.

Ms Delaney was awarded €3,000 by the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) after injuring her ankle when she tripped and fell on a footpath in Dungarvan. 

She was advised that under the previous regime, her injuries could have attracted general damages of between €18,000 and €34,000.

In operation since April 2021, the guidelines have generally resulted in lower awards from the PIAB and more settlements of cases without the need for expensive court hearings.

The Alliance for Insurance Reform claims the Supreme Court ruling has removed any uncertainty and ensured that lower payouts for minor injuries will remain. The organisation’s chief executive Brian Hanley said: “A substantial drop in premiums should absolutely follow the Supreme Court ruling.

“We now have a clear decision from the court in respect of the judicial guidelines and their use.

“The guidelines are the cornerstone of the insurance reform agenda that the Government has delivered.

“These, and essentially everything else the insurance companies were asking for, including the Garda Insurance Fraud Office and the Personal Injuries Resolution Board, have been set up.

“They asked for a lot of reforms they said were needed to improve the market and create an environment so the premiums could come down.

“On that basis, the industry has now finally run out of excuses not to reduce premiums significantly and on a sustained basis.”

Insurance Ireland chief executive Moyagh Murdock also welcomed the court outcome for consumers.

“It will bring much-needed certainty to the market and claimants can take comfort that their claims will be dealt with fairly and more expediently through the Injuries Resolution Board instead of going through a lengthy litigation process.

“The judgment should reduce the hefty legal costs associated with litigated claims,” she said.

The Supreme Court held that the guidelines continue to have effect and further changes would require legislative intervention by the Oireachtas.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...