High Court action over boy’s birth injuries settled for €18m

The National Maternity Hospital has apologised to a six-year-old boy with cerebral palsy for shortcomings in his care and the devastating injuries he suffered at birth.

The letter of apology was read in the High Court as Fionn Feely settled his legal action against the hospital for €18 million. Fionn has spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, cannot speak and needs 24-hour care.

His family’s counsel Liam Reidy SC, instructed by solicitor Lyndy Cantillon, told the court their case was that Fionn should have been delivered three hours earlier than he was. Their contention was that the injury to Fionn’s brain was towards the end of his mother’s labour.

“We say if he had been delivered in accordance with proper standards, there would not be brain damage,” counsel said.

A letter to the Feelys from the hospital’s master Prof Shane Higgins stated: “On behalf of the National Maternity Hospital I wish to sincerely apologise for the shortcomings in care during Mrs Feely’s labour and delivery in April 2015 and to Fionn for his devastating injuries.

“We do not underestimate how difficult and traumatic it has been for you and your family and acknowledge the challenges that you have faced on a daily basis since that time and we are truly sorry.”

Fight for justice

Fionn’s parents, Stephen and Deirdre Feely of Mount Prospect Drive, Clontarf, Dublin, said in a statement outside the court that fighting for justice for their first born child has changed them.

“Like many people anticipating the birth of their first child, our hopes and dreams were wrapped up in one little person. Those dreams were shattered, and it is difficult to describe the devastation we experienced,” they said.

“The joy of holding our first-born child in our arms was taken from us. It was supposed to be the happiest days of our lives, it became our worst.”

Mr Feely said that over the last six years they have known sadness worry and grief on a daily basis but their son is “much more than his diagnosis”.

“Fionn is happy, funny, clever, mischievous, playful, inquisitive and above all loving,” he said. “ We are his world, and he is ours. Our hope now is that we finally have the opportunity to enjoy just being parents to Fionn, as opposed to primarily being his carers and then we will also have a chance to give him absolutely everything he needs and deserves to get the most out of his life.”

No respite

Describing the last six years, Mr Feely said: “There has been no respite from our grief, no respite from our daily struggles and worries no respite from the what ifs and whys and the thoughts of what could have been.

“No amount can account for what Fionn has lost or ever bring back the child that Fionn should have been, but this money will go towards giving him a future he can look forward to and thrive in.”

Fionn, through his father, sued the National Maternity Hospital of Holles Street, Dublin over the circumstances of his birth in April 2015.

National Maternity Hospital, Dublin

It was claimed there were failures to properly manage the pregnancy and labour of Mrs Feely and to properly monitor the baby’s fetal heart rate.

It was further claimed there was failure to recognise and or act on the symptoms or signs of fetal distress and a failure to consider a caesarean section in the circumstance of elevated maternal temperature and pathological CTG trace.

The hospital admitted a breach of duty regarding the allegations made in respect of labour and delivery. It said a foetal blood sample should have been considered between 8.55pm and 9.10pm and consideration should have been given at 9.10pm or shortly thereafter to deliver Fionn by caesarean section.

In court, Mrs Feely said her son was on life support after his birth and he was not expected to survive being taken off it.

Fionn has a great personality and is a joy to spend time with, she said.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey paid tribute to the Feelys and said they were remarkable parents.

Source: Irish Times

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...