Girl who suffered catastrophic brain injury when she was knocked down by speeding doctor awarded €3m

Four Courts, Dublin

31 March 2022

A girl who suffered a catastrophic brain injury when a car driven by a doctor struck her at a pedestrian crossing has settled a High Court action for almost €3m.

Ashleigh Carroll, then 14, was walking to school when she was propelled into the air by the car which had sped along a bus lane in Coolock, Dublin, six years ago.

Her counsel, Richard Kean SC, told the court witnesses said the driver, a doctor from Egypt working at Beaumont Hospital in Dublin, drove at speed along the bus lane and struck the girl who was crossing at pedestrian traffic lights.

“She was thrown very violently into the air,” he said.

The court heard an international arrest warrant exists for the Egyptian doctor.

Counsel said for years after the accident the doctor maintained a full defence in the case, was “entirely dishonest” and alleged that Ashleigh was responsible. Liability was, however, admitted in 2020.

“For a number of years Ashleigh was in a perilous situation, where she could have been deprived of any compensation,” he said.

Ashleigh, now 19, from Glasnevin, Dublin, had through her mother Louise Carroll sued the driver, Dr Shereen El Mashad.


Daily Digest Newsletter

Get ahead of the day with the morning headlines at 7.30am and Fionnán Sheahan’s exclusive take on the day’s news every afternoon, with our free daily newsletter. 

Enter email address 

It was claimed that Ashleigh was lawfully traversing a public footpath near Oscar Traynor Road on October 20, 2016, and was in the process of crossing a roadway when a vehicle driven by the doctor and in particular the wing mirror hit her.

Counsel said liability was conceded in November 2020.

It was an extremely violent collision and the teenager landed on her head on the ground and suffered a very significant injury, the court was told.

The driver later admitted reckless driving, breaking a red light, driving at speed and driving in a bus lane.

Before the accident, the court previously heard Ashleigh was thriving at school and was academically inclined. She had hoped to study forensic anthropology in Harvard along with medicine.

Counsel said she was in second year at secondary school and was also studying Japanese.

Mr Justice Paul Coffey approved the settlement totalling €2.95m.

In a statement outside court read by the family solicitor, Keira O’Reilly, the Carrolls said: “On October 20, 2016, our lives changed forever.

“For four years liability was denied, and Ashleigh was actually blamed for causing the accident and the injury she sustained.

“At the time of the accident, neither Ashleigh or her family were aware what happened, and this was like a black cloud over them when they were already trying to deal with the aftermath of the accident.”

The court previously heard Ashleigh was discharged from hospital on November 16, 2016, and she was not able to read or feed herself .

She did return to school but experts say she has cognitive difficulties from the acquired brain injury and will never be able to work.

Counsel said one of his experts in the case would say Ashleigh suffered a life-altering traumatic brain injury.

He said Ashleigh has no recollection of the accident.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...