Fight back against rise in insurance premiums

14 February 2009

Insurance companies are desperately trying to get us to pay more for our motor and home cover. Some insurers have already raised their premiums, with others threatening increases of up to 20pc.

Take Hibernian Aviva. The company recently noted a sharp rise in claims, with a 20pc increase in own damage claims — where people damage their own cars — and an increased number of cases going through the High Court.

The company’s chief executive, Stuart Purdy, said consumers were set to face increases in motor premiums of 10pc to 15pc this year and increases on home insurance of up to 20pc.

And Quinn Direct, traditionally one of the most competitive operators in the general insurance market, confirmed recently that it has increased its private motor premiums.

Insurers have a range of reasons why premiums are set to rise. With a downturn you get more claims, especially fraudulent ones; lawyers, they say, are pursuing injuries claims with greater vigour; and investment returns have declined so greater profits have to be generated from higher premium.

Another important consideration is that the downturn is as likely to make people search out the best value insurance, as it is to add to insurers’ costs from dodgy claims.

Comparison

A recent report by Deloitte found that almost one-in-five drivers changed motor insurers last year. This trend is likely to accelerate with the arrival in this country of internet-based price comparison sites.

In Britain, two-thirds of motor insurance customers now research their purchase on a comparison site. These sites are starting to emerge in this market, and when they really get going, premiums will fall further.

So it is by no means inevitable that insurance claims will rise, to be followed by higher premiums.

Sorry, insurance companies, we consumers are not having it.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...