ESB sues cartel of truck manufacturers that supplied it with vehicles

ESB Ireland

9 August 2021

ESB has launched legal action against four of the world’s biggest truck manufacturers over their involvement in price fixing that, ESB will allege, pushed up the cost of the distinctive yellow trucks in the semi-State company’s fleet.

The company has filed High Court proceedings against nine international entities associated with the truck manufacturers Volvo, DAF, Iveco and Daimler. The truck companies were fined more than €2.9 billion by the European Commission in 2016 after they were found to be involved in a cartel that fixed the prices of trucks. Swedish manufacturer MAN escaped punishment after it revealed the existence of the cartel to the commission.

The revelation of their cartel behaviour has provoked a legal backlash against the manufacturers across Europe in recent years, with scores of cases launched against them by truck buyers in various countries seeking compensation for violations of competition law.

In the UK, for example, the manufacturers are facing a group action pursued on the logistics industry’s behalf by the Road Haulage Association, which is seeking payouts for business that bought or leased trucks from 1997 to 2011, the years covered by the commission’s cartel finding.

In Ireland close to 60 such cases were filed against the manufacturers and also, in many cases, against their local Irish distributors and sales agents. 

ESB, however, has filed cases only against the international divisions of the manufacturers themselves and not against any local operators.

The swathe of Irish cases outstanding against the truck companies were filed in 2017 by haulage companies seeking redress for allegedly paying over the odds, as well as punitive damages and compensation under the Competition Act. Some of the cases appear to have been discontinued or settled in December 2017, but the bulk were put on the court’s commercial list and remain live.

The European Court of Justice has previously ruled that truck buyers can sue the manufacturers in domestic courts arising from the findings of the European Commission cartel case. Following a mention in the High Court in October 2019, it was expected that the cases would come to trial last year but a date has not yet been set.

ESB, meanwhile, is only at the early stages of its legal cases against the truck companies, who supplied some of the larger vehicles in ESB Networks’ fleet of about 2,700 vehicles, most of which are yellow vans that are not the subject of the allegations in the truck case. 

The electricity company is the first State entity and also the first company outside of the core logistics industry to sue the truck manufacturers over the European price-fixing findings. Up to now the majority of cases filed in Ireland were by hauliers or van rental businesses.

ESB declined to comment on the legal cases.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...