Epilim redress scheme would avoid ‘perpetual litigation’

22 April 2023

A redress scheme should urgently be established for the families of children who were detrimentally impacted by in-utero exposure to the anti-epileptic drug sodium valproate (Epilim), a prominent solicitor has passionately argued. Michael Boylan, a respected legal expert who recently secured a staggering £15 million settlement for a 13-year-old boy, revealed that a wave of similar cases is anticipated to flood the UK courts in the coming months.

Boylan emphasised the necessity for the State to assume responsibility and establish a redress scheme akin to the CervicalCheck tribunal, in order to prevent individual families from enduring the arduous litigation process. “This really should be dealt with by an admission of responsibility by the State here. There should be a form of redress scheme set up, like the CervicalCheck tribunal. Each family shouldn’t have to go through the litigation process on an individual basis,” he stated.

Advocating for a more streamlined approach, Boylan urged the establishment of a system that minimises stress for the affected families and curtails legal expenses. “They really should set it up so the stress can be minimised and there can be saving of legal costs as well. Otherwise, there’s going to be perpetual litigation for several years, if not a decade,” he warned.

In 2020, the British government announced its intention to hold an inquiry into the historical licensing and use of Epilim, acknowledging the gravity of the issue. The terms of reference for the inquiry were agreed upon late last year, and the inquiry itself is expected to be officially established within the current year, signifying a crucial step towards justice for the affected families.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Irish Court Rules Arbitration is for Everyone

The High Court recently addressed a case involving Michael Flatley and his insurers, Hiscox, over an arbitration clause in his insurance policy for his renovated mansion. The court assessed whether the clause was unfair to Mr Flatley as a consumer.

Recent Articles

How much is a lawyer really worth?

With recent commentary from High Court judges past and present, the issue of legal costs in Ireland has arisen once again. Killian Flood writes on the issue of legal costs from a barrister’s perspective. Two weeks ago, Mr Justice Peter Kelly returned to the judge’s...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...