€40,000 settlement after cabin pressure drop left some Ryanair passengers with bleeding ears during emergency landing

The first in a series of compensation claims against Ryanair over injuries allegedly sustained during an emergency landing has been settled for around €40,000.

The cases arise from an incident during which an aircraft cabin became depressurised on a flight between Dublin and Zadar, Croatia.

A sudden loss of cabin pressure forced the pilots to rapidly descend.

Oxygen masks were released during the incident.

German police said 33 of 189 passengers were hospitalised, some bleeding from their ears, after the plane made an emergency landing at Frankfurt Hahn Airport on July 13, 2018.

An interim report by the German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation described it as a “serious incident”.

It triggered a raft of lawsuits, and the first one to reach court was settled yesterday without any admission of liability by the airline.

The plaintiff, an Irish woman, claimed to have suffered severe pain in her ears and shock to her entire nervous system.

She claimed she ended up losing her job due to absence from work after being prescribed anti-anxiety medication.

The woman was represented by Rose Sweeney of Coleman Legal.

Eighteen other clients of the firm, residents of Ireland, Croatia and the US, have also filed legal claims against the airline.

The claims involve a mix of physical and psychological injuries and are being defended by Ryanair.

According to the pleadings in the settled case, the woman claimed to have suffered significant barotrauma to her right ear, which required steroid treatment.

She also claimed the accident caused her anxiety and stress and she developed symptoms suggestive of post-traumatic stress disorder and had to attend counselling.

When the matter came before Dublin Circuit Civil Court yesterday, Judge Sarah Berkeley was told the matter had been settled.

While the settlement sum was not disclosed, the Irish Independent understands it was around €40,000, plus the plaintiff’s legal costs.

Coleman Legal declined to comment on the case.

Ryanair did not respond to a request for comment.

In addition to injuries allegedly suffered, the passenger also complained of having to sit on her bag at Frankfurt Hahn for several hours, of having reduced access to fluids and no access to her hold luggage, which contained antibiotic medication she was taking at the time for urinary tract issues.

She claimed her distress was heightened by poor communication from airline staff.

In a statement at the time, Ryanair said it apologised for “any inconvenience” suffered by passengers when the flight was diverted due to “an in-flight depressurisation”.

The airline said that in line with standard procedure, the crew deployed oxygen masks and initiated a controlled descent.

“The aircraft landed normally and customers disembarked, where a small number received medical attention as a precaution,” the statement added.

“Customers were provided with refreshment vouchers and hotel accommodation was authorised. However, there was a shortage of available accommodation.”

Some passengers were able to board a replacement flight the following day, while a group who were either unable or unwilling to fly continued their journey by coach instead.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...