Domestic Abuse: Couple told to ‘get re-housed or move on’

woman in white dress shirt and black pants sitting on gray couch possibly victim of domestic abuse or divorce

7 September 2021

A judge has warned a combative couple that they will have to “sit down now and get re-housed or move on”. This is the latest in a long running saga in a domestic abuse case in Ireland.

The couple, who have been married for over forty years, have separate protection orders against one another for domestic abuse/violence. They have previously given statements in court that neither is allowed to enter the other’s bedroom or bathroom in the home that they share.

Breach of Domestic Violence Order

The husband now alleges that his wife has breached a domestic violence order, which brought them both before the Family Court once again after repeat applications previously filed by the couple against one another.

However, Judge Mark Larkin warned that the court was no longer going to tolerate the on goings of the couple and their multiple court appearances concerning complaints against each other.

In response, the solicitor for the husband stated that “the marriage has broken down and domestic violence legislation is not going to correct it”. He further noted that there were too many internal agreements concerning who can go where and who can do what in their shared home.

“There is a shared sitting room and a shared washing machine and obviously when the washing machine doesn’t finish when it should finish for a particular person, well then…,” he said.

He added that it was a case of “’you don’t pass that door and I won’t pass that chair but when you pass that door or I pass that chair’, well then…”.

“Risk of Homelessness”

The solicitor representing the wife also claimed that the domestic abuse situation between the two had become “highly dysfunctional”, and that the issue ultimately boils down to one of housing.

“My client has inquired about alternative housing but the council require her to remove her name from the lease and to waive her interest in the property before allowing her to go on the list. That seems to me to be very unfair. She is at risk of homelessness,” she said.

Despite the circumstances, Judge Larkin maintained that the mutual belligerence and abuse between the couple was not something for the court to resolve.

“This is really wear and tear in the marriage and parties need to sit down now and get re-housed or move on,” he said.

Judge Larkin noted that the protection orders were to remain in place and adjourned the case until November.

If you have been a victim of domestic abuse, contact us now for a free assessment of your case.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...