Department of Health ordered to pay official €40,000 for age discrimination

Age Discrimination

22 March 2021

The Department of Health has been ordered to pay a senior official €40,000 in compensation after discriminating against her on age grounds concerning a job application for a promotion.

In the case, higher executive officer at the department, Nicola Matthews, alleged she was discriminated against on age grounds when she was not shortlisted for interview for the post of assistant principal officer.

In his findings, Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) adjudication officer, Brian Dalton upheld Ms Matthews’s discrimination claim contrary to the provisions of the Employment Equality Act arising from unintended indirect discrimination.

Mr Dalton said Ms Matthews’s detailed primary facts show, based on a statistical analysis of the data provided by the department, that older candidates in the age range of 50 to 65 years had a significantly lower chance of being shortlisted for interview.

He said a one-sentence explanation to Ms Matthews as to why she was not successful was not a sufficiently meaningful explanation.

Mr Dalton said the consequence of discrimination in the case is loss of opportunity for Ms Matthews to compete at interview for a promotion.

He said 30 candidates were shortlisted for interview and, in that context, the probability of promotion must be viewed.

He upheld the claim after stating there was a lack of transparency concerning the shortlisting procedure adopted by the shortlisting board.

He found the department has not adequately presented evidence to show that the shortlisting process and procedure applied selection criteria consistently and used an objective and fair evaluation process.

He also found that the failure to provide meaningful feedback and to give reasons for not shortlisting Ms Matthews, having regard to the detail in her application, is evidence of a lack of transparency.

Represented by trade union Fórsa at the WRC, Ms Matthews responded to an internal notice in 2019 advertising for the role of assistant principal officer which is a managerial role in the civil service.

The post currently has a salary range from €69,012 to €85,415.

Those applying for the post were encouraged to ensure that their application form addressed the key competencies listed as important to the role and to provide evidence of how they demonstrated that competency.

Based on how well the candidate provided evidence of that competency, they were shortlisted for interview.

The Department of Health told the WRC that it refuted in all respects that the shortlisting process was inadequate.

It said Ms Matthews was given specific feedback by the board chair who stated she had not provided sufficient evidence to show she met the requirements as detailed under the competency heading of ‘Leadership; Drive and Commitment’.

It claimed there was no credible basis by which Ms Matthews can assert a presumption of discrimination and that at all material times, emphasis was placed on choosing candidates by the appropriateness of their experience and not their age.

Each application was considered on its own merits, it said.

The department also pointed out that the board that drew up the shortlist for interview received training relating to unconscious bias and the Employment Equality Acts with specific reference to direct and indirect discrimination.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...