Cork Woman Awarded €189,000 After a Steel Girder Fell On Her At Work

23 November 2020

52-year old woman who claimed she was left with a scar on her leg which looked like “a shark bite” after a steel girder fell on her at work has been awarded €189,000 by the High Court.

Store supervisor Joann Twomey had claimed the scar looked like a “shark bite”.

Mr Justice Charles Meenan said Ms Twomey was an honest and truthful witness who did not seek to exaggerate the effects of her injury.

The judge, who during the assessment of damages was shown the scar on the woman’s right calf said it was clearly visible from a distance.

“On viewing at an angle, there is a clear indent though I do not think it is of the order of a shark bite”, said the judge, adding he understood why Ms Twomey is of “such a view”.

The judge also accepted Ms Twomey’s evidence that because of the scar on her calf, she only feels able to wear trousers.

Ms Twomey (52) from Patrick’s Hill, Cork, had sued Jeral Ltd trading as Daybreak, Co. Cork, and her employers Jeremy and Alice Buckley as a result of the accident when a steel girder fell on the back of her leg causing a 25cm-long laceration to her right calf.

She claimed there was a failure to secure the iron bar and that it had been stored dangerously. It was further claimed there was a failure to provide her with a safe place of work. Liability was admitted in the case which was before the court for assessment of damages only.

The court heard Ms Twomey after the accident was taken to Cork University Hospital and several days later had to have an operation to suture her leg. After her discharge from the hospital, the wound became infected, and she was readmitted. She also later had to have skin grafts.

Mental Trauma After Work Accident

The judge said she has been left with a scar on her calf together with two other scars from where she had skin grafts. She had given evidence that the calf scar causes her particular upset and embarrassment when she goes swimming.

Ms Twomey had told the court because of the scar, she no longer wears skirts, and as a result of the pain does not wear high heels.

The judge said he did not believe that the pain is an invention on the part of Ms Twomey. And her employment history and involvement in numerous courses post-school presents a picture of a woman anxious to remain in employment and acquire new skills.

The judge said the ongoing pain has affected Ms Twomey’s working life and she now has to work reduced hours. He was satisfied that she had established a basis for the court to award compensation for future loss of earnings.

Compensation

The judge said he had taken into account the ongoing consequences of the measures taken to halt the spread of Covid-19 as regards the retail sector. He considered a 40 per cent reduction appropriate on the future-loss-of-earnings claim, awarding just over €69,000 in that category.

The judge awarded general damages of €80,000 damages and special damages, bringing the total to €189,409.

Irish Times

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...