Child who hurt finger in Dublin city playground settles action for €37,500

27 July 2021

A child who hurt her finger as she played on a slide in a Dublin city playground has settled her High Court action for €37,500.

Ruby Murphy was aged three when the incident occurred at the public playground near Kylemore Park Ballyfermot, Dublin on March 7th, 2016.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Garrett Simons said the child had suffered a nasty injury to a finger on her left hand but the scarring is now not particularly noticeable.

Through her father Anthony Murphy, Ballyfermot Parade, Dublin, the child had sued Dublin City Council. Liability was denied.

In an affidavit, Mr Murphy said his daughter sustained a serious injury as a result of coming into contact with an alleged dangerous and defective part of the slide in the playground.

Significant laceration

When admitted to a hospital emergency department, she was found to have sustained a significant laceration to her little finger, he said

She had to have surgery and had to wear a splint for three weeks.

He said she has been left with scarring and it was the opinion of a plastic surgeon she had sustained a nasty crush laceration of her left little finger which had to be repaired under general anaesthetic.

In a recent examination, the child was found to have made an excellent recovery and was not expected to have functional problems in the future.

Mr Murphy said his daughter has been left with scars on her left finger but they are flat and pale in colour and she has full movement of the finger.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...