Interim €2.5 million settlement agreed for boy with cerebral palsy

26 October 2018

Image result for High Court Ireland

A nine-year-old boy with cerebral palsy who sued over the circumstances of his birth at Wexford General Hospital has settled his High Court action on terms including an interim payment of €2.5 million.

Jack Wickham’s mother Sinéad said the settlement means she and her husband Nick can now be “normal regular parents” to their three children “without having the having the financial worry and burden on our shoulders” that comes with having a child with such physical needs.

Ms Wickham said Jack can now have immediate access to occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech and language therapy without having to go on a waiting list or wait for a therapist to return from maternity or sick leave because their post has not been filled.

“Equipment he so needs can now be bought immediately without having to get approval from the manager of a particular service and then to wait up to six months for the paperwork to go through and the equipment arrives,” she said.

Jack, of Tullerstown, Ballycullane, New Ross, Co Wexford, had, through his mother, sued the HSE over the circumstances of his birth at Wexford General Hospital on October 29th 2008.

It was claimed the baby showed signs of foetal distress or compromise and there was failure to discern the symptoms and to act appropriately.

It was further claimed there was failure to take action at 6am on the morning of his birth notwithstanding the nature of the CTG trace. The second stage of labour had, it was claimed, been prolonged without confirmation of foetal well being.

The claims were denied.

The interim payment is intended to cover care for the next seven years when the case will come back to court to assess future care needs.

Bruce Antoniotti SC, for the child, said Jack was delivered at 7am but their case was, had he been delivered twenty minutes earlier, he would have been spared damage.

Jack has spastic quadriplegia but is a happy, bright child, he said .

Ms Wickham told the court it was a “a very bitter sweet day” and “a long process to get get here.”

The events of the morning of Jack’s birth will stay with her forever and impacted on how their other two children were delivered, she said.

“Jack has to live with this condition every day. He has huge challenges to overcome every single day. We have the most amazing, clever, witty and strong minded child who deserves to live his life to the absolute fullest and today goes a long way in ensuring that we as parents can do everything in our power to help him fulfil his dreams,” she said.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Kevin Cross said Jack has received wonderful care from his family and he wished them all well for the future.

Source: Irish Times

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...