Case taken after girl spilled hot chocolate on lap during flight settled

Aer Lingus

20 July 2021

A teenager who claimed she was scalded when hot chocolate fell on her lap during an Aer Lingus flight has settled her High Court action for €20,000.

Joy Lonergan was aged 13 and was travelling from Barcelona to Dublin when the accident happened on July 16th 2018.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons was told liability was at issue in the case

Ms Lonergan, now aged 15, had through her mother, Michelle Culliton, Bennettsbridge, Co Kilkenny, sued Aer Lingus Ltd.

In an affidavit, Ms Culliton said the spillage happened as Joy was returning home with the rest of her family from a holiday in Spain.

Ms Culliton said hot liquid spilled on her daughter’s lap and thighs.

Joy was immediately treated for her burns by air stewards who applied cold water and cooling gels and gave her paracetamol for pain relief, Ms Culliton said.

Her daughter was in considerable pain and distress and cried for the duration of the flight.

After the aeroplane touched down in Dublin, the girl was transferred to Temple Street Children’s Hospital for treatment.

The burns were dressed and she was prescribed anti-inflammatories.

Joy’s dressings had to be changed over the next three weeks and she was in distress and discomfort, Ms Culliton said. The burns later cleared up and in December a consultant examined the thigh area and found no residual evidence of burns.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Simons said the girl suffered very unpleasant burns and it was to the credit of the Aer Lingus stewards that they tended very quickly to the accident.

The judge who had read the medical reports said the burns had healed up though the young girl had an unpleasant time for a number of weeks.

He noted the airline had not conceded liability and that €20,000 was the full value of the case.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...